Single number three.. What will it be?

fool · Post by **fool** » 2/12/2006, 1:55 am

Could the third single be "Love and Trust?" Another source has reported hearing it on the radio.

from cc

Hope · Post by **Hope** » 2/12/2006, 3:59 am

Codith2k2 wrote:future is that one song most bands would kill for some mainstream attention. So why they didnt even pick that yet, I will never know.

agreed. wtf is up with NOT releasing that as a single?

nikki4982 · Post by **nikki4982** » 2/12/2006, 5:58 am

I'd say that maybe they don't want the chart success, but they wouldn't have released A/L/S if that were the case.

SpiritualJunkie · Post by **SpiritualJunkie** » 2/12/2006, 1:14 pm

Am I the only one who doesn't really like "Will the Future Blame Us?" The chorus sends shivers down my spine but I really don't like how poppy the verses sound.

Brooklin Matt · Post by **Brooklin Matt** » 2/12/2006, 4:39 pm

It sounded great before Bob Rock got his stinkin paws on it. It's still a pretty decent tune. I always thought it was the obvious next single.

Sonya · Post by **Sonya** » 2/12/2006, 8:06 pm

SpiritualJunkie wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't really like "Will the Future Blame Us?" The chorus sends shivers down my spine but I really don't like how poppy the verses sound.

nope, you're not.

Rusty · Post by **Rusty** » 2/12/2006, 10:02 pm

nikki4982 wrote:I'd say that maybe they don't want the chart success, but they wouldn't have released A/L/S if that were the case.

That's what I was thinking. Like, this album isn't about getting success, but making a statement about stuff? A very personal album or something.

nikki4982 · Post by **nikki4982** » 2/13/2006, 6:12 am

Brooklin Matt wrote:It sounded great before Bob Rock got his stinkin paws on it. It's still a pretty decent tune. I always thought it was the obvious next single.

Ummm... wha? I just have one question... how exactly do you know when Bob Rock came into the picture with that song?

thirdhour · Post by **thirdhour** » 2/13/2006, 12:12 pm

binoculars, obviously.

nikki4982 · Post by **nikki4982** » 2/13/2006, 12:20 pm

Smooke · Post by **Smooke** » 2/13/2006, 10:53 pm

Great idea!!

When OLP play at the Juno's I'll make sure to bring binoculars!!!

Brooklin Matt · Post by **Brooklin Matt** » 2/14/2006, 12:31 am

Because we heard a snippet of the guitar during the 2003 Holiday Greeting, and it sounded really nice. But the version we got seems a little more drained of sound.....like they simplified the sound so it was more bland.

I admit that Bob Rock could have had nothing to do with it.........but I have my suspicions.

SaturdayNightz · Post by **SaturdayNightz** » 2/14/2006, 6:21 am

Brooklin Matt wrote:Because we heard a snippet of the guitar during the 2003 Holiday Greeting, and it sounded really nice. But the version we got seems a little more drained of sound.....like they simplified the sound so it was more bland.

I admit that Bob Rock could have had nothing to do with it.........but I have my suspicions.

i kinda understand were you're coming from, the guitar on the snippet had a very organic sound to it, but they shortened it and kinda drowned it out on the final version.

nikki4982 · Post by **nikki4982** » 2/14/2006, 6:54 am

But assuming Bob Rock is the reason that happened is silly.

Axtech · Post by **Axtech** » 2/14/2006, 12:24 pm

YOU'RE silly

nikki4982 · Post by **nikki4982** » 2/14/2006, 12:39 pm

I know.

Johnny · Post by **Johnny** » 2/14/2006, 2:01 pm

Axtech · Post by **Axtech** » 2/14/2006, 4:37 pm

x100

Johnny · Post by **Johnny** » 2/14/2006, 6:14 pm

Brooklin Matt · Post by **Brooklin Matt** » 2/15/2006, 5:17 pm

Bob Rock has a history with this type of thing. It's not that silly to consider..

I think you'd want me muzzled Nikki.........maybe that's how you like your men........but that's another story.