Page 1 of 2

Good to see someone smarten up

Posted: 12/19/2003, 7:05 pm
by Venom
Libya decides it will destroy its WMD's. Proves that what the US is doing is having some effect on other countries that shouldn't have these weapons. Now if we can get them to stop supporting terrorists!

http://news.yahoo.com/fc?tmpl=fc&cid=34&in=world&cat=libya

Posted: 12/19/2003, 7:08 pm
by Joe Cooler
Oddly enough the US was one of the biggest supporters of Iraq quite a few years back.

Posted: 12/19/2003, 10:08 pm
by Lando
I support Your Rack...

Posted: 12/20/2003, 7:27 am
by call me andrew
why cant lybia have weapons?

Posted: 12/20/2003, 11:10 am
by nelison
same reason why the USA shouldn't have them. they kill people.

Posted: 12/21/2003, 1:56 am
by robcore
So should the U.S. be the only country allowed to have weapons?

Posted: 12/21/2003, 7:34 am
by Lando
I personally think the USA should only get pitchforks, and canada should only get pumpkins.

Now see, this is fair, even though most of you think the pitchfork has the advantage, but lets not forget, the pumpkins can be used from long range...

Posted: 12/21/2003, 11:25 am
by Joe Cooler
^ True That.

Posted: 12/21/2003, 12:00 pm
by Random Name
Canada should be allowed weapons...I mean its not like we'll ever use them!

Posted: 12/21/2003, 1:11 pm
by ihatethunderbay
Random Name wrote:Canada should be allowed weapons...I mean its not like we'll ever use them!


but if any country other than the U.S has weapons, they're terrorists

Posted: 12/21/2003, 3:38 pm
by Lando
why would canada need weapons? I know we'll never use them, but it's pointless when you've already been trained to use rocks and sticks!

Posted: 12/21/2003, 4:16 pm
by Axtech
I assume that by "smarten up" you mean "fear for the lives of the innocent men, women and children that will inevitably be murdered by American troops if they don't lower their defences to a level well bellow that of the US so that Bush can feel a little more power."

Posted: 12/21/2003, 4:19 pm
by ihatethunderbay
i would laugh so hard if bush got assassinated. i mean, i'd freakin' throw a party. a big party. with lots of chips and beer and pop. and some guitars.

this has nothing to do with the current topic, but it's not like nobody else spams around here :P

oh and i suppose i'm a terrorist now, because i want george w. bush to die. oh well.

Posted: 12/21/2003, 5:14 pm
by nelison
Personally i believe that if the USA is forcing other countries to dismantle their weapons, they should practice what they preach.

Posted: 12/21/2003, 5:44 pm
by Axtech
But then wouldn't Bush have to kill himself?

Posted: 12/21/2003, 9:09 pm
by Corey
...oops... I must have walked in on the "special" thread....

Posted: 12/21/2003, 10:03 pm
by call me andrew
fucktard.

Posted: 12/22/2003, 6:37 am
by Venom
...oops... I must have walked in on the "special" thread....


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

What I don't find funny is the people who actually want to see someone assasinated. You can hate Bush all you want but it sheds more light on who you really are when you wanna see him die. Doesn't speak well for your postion.

Posted: 12/22/2003, 7:20 am
by Venom
but if any country other than the U.S has weapons, they're terrorists


Are the British, Russian, French (well maybe), Chinese, Indians,etc terrorists??? Nope. Try again.

Posted: 12/22/2003, 10:10 am
by starvingeyes
venom, i think the connection you draw between your conquest of iraq and libya's choice to destroy their wmd's is rather dubious, especially when the financial motivators to do so are so plainly obvious.

you know, and i know, and bush knows, and gadhafi knows that the us isn't going to be attacking libya, maybe ever, but at least not any time in the forseeable future.