Good to see someone smarten up

Venom · Post by **Venom** » 12/19/2003, 7:05 pm

Libya decides it will destroy its WMD's. Proves that what the US is doing is having some effect on other countries that shouldn't have these weapons. Now if we can get them to stop supporting terrorists!

http://news.yahoo.com/fc?tmpl=fc&cid=34&in=world&cat=libya

Joe Cooler · Post by **Joe Cooler** » 12/19/2003, 7:08 pm

Oddly enough the US was one of the biggest supporters of Iraq quite a few years back.

Lando · Post by **Lando** » 12/19/2003, 10:08 pm

I support Your Rack...

call me andrew · Post by **call me andrew** » 12/20/2003, 7:27 am

why cant lybia have weapons?

nelison · Post by **nelison** » 12/20/2003, 11:10 am

same reason why the USA shouldn't have them. they kill people.

robcore · Post by **robcore** » 12/21/2003, 1:56 am

So should the U.S. be the only country allowed to have weapons?

Lando · Post by **Lando** » 12/21/2003, 7:34 am

I personally think the USA should only get pitchforks, and canada should only get pumpkins.

Now see, this is fair, even though most of you think the pitchfork has the advantage, but lets not forget, the pumpkins can be used from long range...

Joe Cooler · Post by **Joe Cooler** » 12/21/2003, 11:25 am

^ True That.

Random Name · Post by **Random Name** » 12/21/2003, 12:00 pm

Canada should be allowed weapons...I mean its not like we'll ever use them!

ihatethunderbay · Post by **ihatethunderbay** » 12/21/2003, 1:11 pm

Random Name wrote:Canada should be allowed weapons...I mean its not like we'll ever use them!

but if any country other than the U.S has weapons, they're terrorists

Lando · Post by **Lando** » 12/21/2003, 3:38 pm

why would canada need weapons? I know we'll never use them, but it's pointless when you've already been trained to use rocks and sticks!

Axtech · Post by **Axtech** » 12/21/2003, 4:16 pm

I assume that by "smarten up" you mean "fear for the lives of the innocent men, women and children that will inevitably be murdered by American troops if they don't lower their defences to a level well bellow that of the US so that Bush can feel a little more power."

ihatethunderbay · Post by **ihatethunderbay** » 12/21/2003, 4:19 pm

i would laugh so hard if bush got assassinated. i mean, i'd freakin' throw a party. a big party. with lots of chips and beer and pop. and some guitars.

this has nothing to do with the current topic, but it's not like nobody else spams around here

oh and i suppose i'm a terrorist now, because i want george w. bush to die. oh well.

nelison · Post by **nelison** » 12/21/2003, 5:14 pm

Personally i believe that if the USA is forcing other countries to dismantle their weapons, they should practice what they preach.

Axtech · Post by **Axtech** » 12/21/2003, 5:44 pm

But then wouldn't Bush have to kill himself?

Corey · Post by **Corey** » 12/21/2003, 9:09 pm

...oops... I must have walked in on the "special" thread....

call me andrew · Post by **call me andrew** » 12/21/2003, 10:03 pm

fucktard.

Venom · Post by **Venom** » 12/22/2003, 6:37 am

...oops... I must have walked in on the "special" thread....

What I don't find funny is the people who actually want to see someone assasinated. You can hate Bush all you want but it sheds more light on who you really are when you wanna see him die. Doesn't speak well for your postion.

Venom · Post by **Venom** » 12/22/2003, 7:20 am

but if any country other than the U.S has weapons, they're terrorists

Are the British, Russian, French (well maybe), Chinese, Indians,etc terrorists??? Nope. Try again.

starvingeyes · Post by **starvingeyes** » 12/22/2003, 10:10 am

venom, i think the connection you draw between your conquest of iraq and libya's choice to destroy their wmd's is rather dubious, especially when the financial motivators to do so are so plainly obvious.

you know, and i know, and bush knows, and gadhafi knows that the us isn't going to be attacking libya, maybe ever, but at least not any time in the forseeable future.