Liberals Passing Wrong Dog Bill, Clip the Owners
"I was saddened to hear of an attack by a Labrador retriever. Saddened for the victim who had to experience a horrific dog attack. Saddened because the Liberal goverment is introducing legislation which will not help victims like the child in the attack.
On October 27th, CTV in North Bay reported a very bad attack on a 2 year old boy. The attacking dog was a
black lab. The child suffered from bites to his face. The boy's grandmother asked the owner for permission to pet the dog. The owners said ok and then the dog attacked the child's face. There have been many other serious dog attacks recently:
* in 1 week alone there have been 2 attacks involving a german shepherd and a rottweiler that were not reported to the media.
* there was a doberman attack reported on city tv last night
* there was another attack involving an off duty german shepard that went unreported
* there was a german shepard attack in september on a child waiting for a school bus
* a radio station reported that there was a serious attack by a golden retriever in sept.
* in early sept. a coon hound attacked viciously, gouging into a child's stomach that it took 65 stitches to close the wound
* in late august a chesapeake bay retriever in london, ontario attacked a child's face and neck - 141 stitches were required
It is guaranteed that there have been hundreds of other serious bites in this province that have gone unreported, and that these will have involved a large variety of breeds and cross breeds. In the same time period there have been only
2 attacks involving "pitt bulls". In one case the victim was alleged to have been a) intoxicated and b) had one of the two male dogs he was walking in a headlock when the second dog attacked. In the second case, the owner kept trained attack dogs on her property and they did exactly what they had been trained to do when the owner let them outside - attack
All of these attacks are horrible but as the experts have said, dog attacks are independent of breed. They have everything to do with ownership and accountability. The Staffordshire Bull Terrier Club of Canada calls on on the Liberal Goverment to make all owners accountable.
Ontario does not need reactionary legislation. We need to learn from the mistakes of others like the UK and Colorado, where it has been proven that breed bans are costly and ineffective. We also need to look at laws that have worked well, like the laws in Calgary. That is what "smart government" is all about.
Passing legislation to ban pitt bulls is a reactionary, overboard action. Pitt bulls are not ticking bombs. For goodness sakes, they're not even a breed! This grouping of dogs is easy to attack because they are sensationalized by the media for a simple reason: pitt bull incidents sell papers and shows. They were originally bred to fight dogs, but were not bred for human aggression. The same cannot be said for many other breeds that were developed to attack people.
If you look at just one breed to be banned under Bill 132, the Staffordshire Bull Terrier, it becomes apparent how ridiculous this bill really is. This breed has one of the lowest bite records in the dog world and has never killed a person. Researchers classified the Staffordshire Bull Terrier as one of the 10 best breeds for children. Yet Bill 132 would see this wonderful breed exterminated.
Thousands of innocent dogs will be killed if Bill 132 passes. Bill 132 will not improve public safety. An accountable Dog Owners Act would. The Saffordshire Bull Terrier club calls on the Liberal Government to protect the safety of all Ontarians by scrapping Bill 132 in favour of an owners accountability act. We call on the Liberal Government to protect all victims.
Punish the deed, not the breed.
