ClumsyMonkey.net

Mister Chainsaw wrote:I wish that sniper in Washington DC could be freed just to put a bullet through the brain of Bush. It would be heavenly, knowing that the person we call a president would be buried. I personally would smile.

I don't know what I was thinking when I got that word.

just a little harsh.

and not really any better than what he's doing. It's the same principle.

Yeah, what I said was harsh, but still. Why should we have to fight a war for some one that was appointed president, and not some one that actually won the election? By the way, I don't like one man, and I would much rather have him impeached than dead, but how am I comparable to him? I don't believe what his views are, and he wants to kill Arabs for oil. Tell me, where am I like George Bush?

Does anyone else think impeachment would be a grand idea? We impeach a guy for enjoying oral sex, but we stand behind a man fighting an unjust war. Last time I checked I would much rather put my trust in a man that kept himself from fighting wars and kept the economy running well, not some one who thinks he can be the next Napolean and goes ahead and does what he wants to spite the entire country.

Fuck George Bush in his stupid little ass.

Endymion wrote:oh, was that mean? I apologize to any non white trash fast food employees, here.

My friend's dad started calling their french poodle a Freedom Poodle

Mister Chainsaw wrote:Yeah, what I said was harsh, but still. Why should we have to fight a war for some one that was appointed president, and not some one that actually won the election? By the way, I don't like one man, and I would much rather have him impeached than dead, but how am I comparable to him? I don't believe what his views are, and he wants to kill Arabs for oil. Tell me, where am I like George Bush?

Does anyone else think impeachment would be a grand idea? We impeach a guy for enjoying oral sex, but we stand behind a man fighting an unjust war. Last time I checked I would much rather put my trust in a man that
kept himself from fighting wars and kept the economy running well, not some one who thinks he can be the next Napolean and goes ahead and does what he wants to spite the entire country.

Fuck George Bush in his stupid little ass.

Alan, you are so misinformed by the liberals, it appalls me.

Bush won the election.
He is not kililng Arabs for oil. The US pays top dollar for oil. If we wanted it that badly, we'd just take it. Stop it with that nonsense.

Clinton was not impeached for his relationship with Miss Lewinsky. That is a common misconception. He was ousted for LYING in court. Perjury is one of the most serious offenses possible. (Not to mention that the man was a murderer)

Bush is not doing just what he wants. He is acting in correlation of Resolution 1441.

Please do your research.

Bush is doing just what he wants. He is violating the UN.

I might not be too clear with my views Corey, but I know one thing, I do not want to go to war.

and I respect that.

All presidents are elected, but not by the population. You only elect the people who elect the president.

If Bush really wanted to kill people for oil, couldn't he just kill environmentalist liberals here so we could start drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge?

Bush is simultaneously going along with resolution 1441 and violating the UN. Either way is arguable and right, because the UN, like Bill Clinton's foreign policy was, lacks consistency. Not that consistency is always important, but sometimes if you are too inconsistent you send out a confused message of what actions require a strong response and what is acceptable.

Bush already shoved through all sorts of bills that are allowing drilling to begin in previously protected Alaskan regions. Nice try though.

and he'll probably ink his name on a bill that will give General motors and others money for research on hybrid and electric cars with the same pen he used on that one. i know if i were a "stupid texan president" i would.

happeninfish wrote:Bush already shoved through all sorts of bills that are allowing drilling to begin in previously protected Alaskan regions. Nice try though.

actually that was voted down. nice thry though.

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/03/ ... index.html

this war is not about oil.

of course it's not.

I'm curious...

If the US is going against "French" fries, are they going to get rid of the Statue of Liberty, given to them by France? I doubt it. This is just propaganda.

http://www.sendbackliberty.us

uh, rob.......

Broken link.

But I can tell from the name of the site what it is.

I'll take back my comment now, if I can. :ohwell:

Now it works.

link fixed. please observe website.

Is that a joke? Seriously. It would cost more to send it back than to just burn it down or something...