Page 3 of 4
Posted: 6/22/2005, 5:48 pm
by afealicious
oh yummmmm i haven't had one of those in AGES

Posted: 6/23/2005, 10:28 am
by nikki4982
Canadians are weird. They're CANDY BARS!!! There's candy inside of the chocolate most of the time!!!
Posted: 6/23/2005, 10:29 am
by superrgirll
what do you call a bar that has no candy on the inside and is pure chocolate?
Posted: 6/23/2005, 10:30 am
by afealicious
by the way, chocolate=/=candy
never ever ever
chocolate needs its own category.
Posted: 6/23/2005, 10:37 am
by AnnieDreams
Personally, I wouldn't consider peanut butter, nuts, wafer or cookie candy. However, they're all (save for the one I mentioned) covered in chocolate. Being the common factor, it becomes the point of reference.
Posted: 6/23/2005, 10:39 am
by afealicious
but see, the chocolate has to be COMBINED with those things to be considered candy. chocolate alone is not.
although chocolate combined with candy should still be called a chocolate bar. because you know, it's the better way.
Posted: 6/23/2005, 10:41 am
by AnnieDreams
...I was arguing on the side of chocolate bar. I agree with you.
Posted: 6/23/2005, 11:07 am
by nikki4982
Pssh, chocolate is candy.
Posted: 6/23/2005, 11:40 am
by beautiful liar
what does it matter??
i use both

Posted: 6/23/2005, 11:52 am
by Sonya
so do i.
it's just easier that way.
Posted: 6/23/2005, 2:27 pm
by Rusty
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII want candy *dances*
Posted: 6/23/2005, 7:29 pm
by AnnieDreams
do dodo dodo do do!
Posted: 6/23/2005, 10:44 pm
by nikki4982
IIIIIIIIIIII WANT CANDY!!!
Posted: 6/23/2005, 11:33 pm
by Dr. Hobo
i dont
Posted: 6/23/2005, 11:39 pm
by Johnny
well, what do you want?
Posted: 6/23/2005, 11:40 pm
by Dr. Hobo
nothing
im the dolphin king
i dont need anything
Posted: 6/23/2005, 11:40 pm
by Johnny
not even brains?
Posted: 6/24/2005, 12:08 am
by Dr. Hobo
not right now
Posted: 6/24/2005, 12:08 am
by Rusty
How about a pair of pants?
Posted: 6/24/2005, 12:10 am
by Dr. Hobo
no