J-Neli wrote:You are entitled to your opinion, and you have the right to not to have an abortion should you not want one (if you were a woman...), but at the same time those who believe abortion is right should be entitled to that right, especially considering the large numbers on both sides of the coin.
You may say "yes but if a group of people believe murder is right, they surely shouldn't be entitled to killing people" which is correct, only because maybe a miniscule portion of the population (maybe 0.00001%) may find it justifiable. In the case of abortion, although there are no official numbers there can be anywhere from a 50/50 split to 80/20 in either direction. Therefore, one group can't force their beliefs onto another.
This justification of majority rule is highly illogical.
Where is the line? what if suddenly 10% of the population decided slaves were a natural part of life. is ten percent enough to qualify a position as moral?
What if 90% of Canada votes to kill the other 10%. Is this right? Is it rational?
I find it highly amusing and somewhat hypocritical that you believe that pro-lifers should not be able to force their views on you, but you would have no problem forcing your belief that welfare is a right on a capitalist.
demockracy makes hypocrities of everyone.