
Last night I watched part one of a two-part interview with Moore on PBS. The interviewer did an amazing job of asking the tough questions - basically bringing up all of the issues with the movie discussed in here. Moore handled himself very well, in spite of that, and was able to prove his points and show his point of view.
Moore said that his purpose isn't to come to any conclusions. For example, the Bin Laden family was allowed to fly out of the country. The interviewer hit him hard asking what he was suggesting with that. Moore's point wasn't that there was any one reason why that was done - though he did give his opinion of it - he said the point was that he was asking the important questions. Why were they allowed to leave?