August 20th- Cleveland, OH- House of Blues

Tattooed Angels · Post by **Tattooed Angels** » 8/25/2009, 4:45 pm

TWIGZ. just watched some of your vids. What kind of camera did you use. Comes out clear. When I taped the shows had some static, but people tell me cause I was on top of the monitors.

twiqz · Post by **twiqz** » 8/25/2009, 9:52 pm

Tattooed Angels wrote:TWIGZ. just watched some of your vids. What kind of camera did you use. Comes out clear. When I taped the shows had some static, but people tell me cause I was on top of the monitors.

I was already asked this on this Cleveland forum, but its cool...Those videos werent even uploaded in the HD format, that was more of a quick upload for everyone to see. Uploading the vids in HD takes about twice if not 3x's the time it takes for the standard definition ones to upload(and the standards take an hour)
I made sure when i bought the camera at the time that I got a 'top of the line' digital camera, i researched many sites and read many reviews before investing the money. I bought it new 4 months ago and it was $220, so it might be cheaper now. Its the best investment ive ever made, Every concert i go to the clarity of the pictures are phenomenal. And i can make changes to the way it records and takes pictures but haven't gotten myself familiar with those settings yet, so everything is just set on 'automatic'.

But its a Canon poweshot SD790 IS

[/img]

If your going to buy a camera i HIGHLY reccomend this one

Tattooed Angels · Post by **Tattooed Angels** » 8/26/2009, 4:21 pm

twiqz wrote:
Tattooed Angels wrote:TWIGZ. just watched some of your vids. What kind of camera did you use. Comes out clear. When I taped the shows had some static, but people tell me cause I was on top of the monitors.

I was already asked this on this Cleveland forum, but its cool...Those videos werent even uploaded in the HD format, that was more of a quick upload for everyone to see. Uploading the vids in HD takes about twice if not 3x's the time it takes for the standard definition ones to upload(and the standards take an hour)
I made sure when i bought the camera at the time that I got a 'top of the line' digital camera, i researched many sites and read many reviews before investing the money. I bought it new 4 months ago and it was $220, so it might be cheaper now. Its the best investment ive ever made, Every concert i go to the clarity of the pictures are phenomenal. And i can make changes to the way it records and takes pictures but haven't gotten myself familiar with those settings yet, so everything is just set on 'automatic'.

But its a Canon poweshot SD790 IS

[/img]

If your going to buy a camera i HIGHLY reccomend this one

I got as pasonic one. I was going to get a cannon, nikon but the guy there told me to get the pasonic one. it does video in HD.. Only thing is ( probably cause I was on top of stage) you get some static... I love my new camera. The photos are great and video comes out great also.

ClumsyGirl618 · Post by **ClumsyGirl618** » 8/26/2009, 4:52 pm

twiqz wrote:
Tattooed Angels wrote:TWIGZ. just watched some of your vids. What kind of camera did you use. Comes out clear. When I taped the shows had some static, but people tell me cause I was on top of the monitors.

I was already asked this on this Cleveland forum, but its cool...Those videos werent even uploaded in the HD format, that was more of a quick upload for everyone to see. Uploading the vids in HD takes about twice if not 3x's the time it takes for the standard definition ones to upload(and the standards take an hour)
I made sure when i bought the camera at the time that I got a 'top of the line' digital camera, i researched many sites and read many reviews before investing the money. I bought it new 4 months ago and it was $220, so it might be cheaper now. Its the best investment ive ever made, Every concert i go to the clarity of the pictures are phenomenal. And i can make changes to the way it records and takes pictures but haven't gotten myself familiar with those settings yet, so everything is just set on 'automatic'.

But its a Canon poweshot SD790 IS

[/img]

If your going to buy a camera i HIGHLY reccomend this one

This is very close to the camera I have. mine is 7.1 Mega pixels and is the SD750. I bought mine last year in the spring and I love it. It takes excellent video and audio.... if only I was a better videographer....

Post by **saman** » 8/26/2009, 5:42 pm

i have a canon sd1100. an older model, but considering it doesn't have image stabilization, it's still an awesome camera

ClumsyGirl618 · Post by **ClumsyGirl618** » 8/26/2009, 9:22 pm

Locobone has a newer Cannon SD camera too. It takes awesome video. The moral of the story is Cannon camera's are a good way to go!

Post by **saman** » 8/27/2009, 1:01 am

cannon's okay, but i like canon better

twiqz · Post by **twiqz** » 8/27/2009, 9:57 am

saman wrote:cannon's okay, but i like canon better

HAHAHA, Clumsy girl , you gonna take that?!?!

ClumsyGirl618 · Post by **ClumsyGirl618** » 8/27/2009, 10:21 am

Yes, because I'm passive-aggressive and I forget to proofread. I deserve it! I had a special moment. Sigh. i'm not usually that dumb.... I promise!

twiqz · Post by **twiqz** » 8/27/2009, 10:22 am

ClumsyGirl618 wrote:Yes, because I'm passive-aggressive and I forget to proofread. I deserve it! I had a special moment. Sigh. i'm not usually that dumb.... I promise!

laurel · Post by **laurel** » 8/27/2009, 12:14 pm

ClumsyGirl618 wrote:Yes, because I'm passive-aggressive and I forget to proofread. I deserve it! I had a special moment. Sigh. i'm not usually that dumb.... I promise!

...Maybe I should be nice and not point out another mistake in your previous post.

Maybe. But...because Neil hasn't been around lately, and I haven't been able to yell at him about errant apostrophes and commas, I feel the need to point this one out.

ClumsyGirl618 wrote:Locobone has a newer Cannon SD camera too. It takes awesome video. The moral of the story is Cannon camera's are a good way to go!

It should be cameras, not camera's. The way the sentence is phrased, it sounds like you are talking about Canon cameras, in the plural. If you wanted to use the possessive, it would be used on "Canon", as in "Canon's cameras are a good way to go".

Neil, come back so I can bother you about apostrophes

.

I'm sorry for the long grammar lesson post. I haven't corrected anyone in so long, I'm done school forever, and I felt the need to actually use my brain again.

Post by **xjsb125** » 8/27/2009, 12:55 pm

I'm done school forever, eh? Eat more fish. It is nice to see you using capitalization. Nice work!

Kicker774 · Post by **Kicker774** » 8/27/2009, 9:02 pm

laurel wrote:I haven't corrected anyone in so long, I'm done school forever, and I felt the need to actually use my brain again.

RUN ON SENTENCE!!! RUN ON SENTENCE!!! RUN ON SENTENCE!!!

*Picks up the phone and dials 811 for the grammar police*

Post by **xjsb125** » 8/27/2009, 9:09 pm

I'll ban you.