Single number three.. What will it be?

Smooke · Post by **Smooke** » 1/5/2006, 11:19 pm

how can you tell that you voted

I went to click submit and it never gave me an indication that I had voted.

It just went back to the submit screen :wtf:

nikki4982 · Post by **nikki4982** » 1/6/2006, 6:19 am

Axtech wrote:bahahahahaha

I checked out the voting thing

You're not voting for the next single.

It's called marketing. Sony's trying to decide which song appeals to their key demographic.

Now, that's not true! If you happen to fall into the key demographic, then your vote'll count! :roll:

naseoj · Post by **naseoj** » 1/6/2006, 8:37 am

Well which one is the key demographic?

Axtech · Post by **Axtech** » 1/6/2006, 11:47 am

don't know, and obviously Sony's not going to tell us.

They're likely going to gauge the results in each demographic.

I would say, however, that their key demo is probably between 16-24. That's the prime CD-buying, MTV/Much-watching, concert-going age range.

nikki4982 · Post by **nikki4982** » 1/6/2006, 12:25 pm

I wouldn't even include the 20-24 range in the demo. We're too old. :roll:

Kathy · Post by **Kathy** » 1/6/2006, 12:28 pm

uh oh. If I put that I'm 25 will they ignore my vote because I'm not in the right demographic??

nikki4982 · Post by **nikki4982** » 1/6/2006, 12:35 pm

Probably. But it's ok, half of us will probably get ignored. :duncan:

nikki4982 · Post by **nikki4982** » 1/6/2006, 12:36 pm

... and, heck, the band would definitely be ignored if they were to vote! :lol:

Kathy · Post by **Kathy** » 1/6/2006, 1:05 pm

haha - very true!

Soozy · Post by **Soozy** » 1/6/2006, 1:58 pm

I voted for WTFBU for the reasons Robbo put so well.

Not that it's gonna count anyway, cos I'm sure I'm not in an age group they care about.

And about that thing Nikki said, with the band not being in an age group that counts, it made me think of this:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/4584858.stm

nikki4982 · Post by **nikki4982** » 1/6/2006, 2:58 pm

The four members of the Rolling Stones have a combined age of 246, with guitarist Ronnie Wood the youngest at 58.

I love how there's NO reason to add up their ages... yet they did. :lol:

thirdhour · Post by **thirdhour** » 1/6/2006, 3:20 pm

And I love the picture and caption at the bottom of the story that is there for no reason.

reza · Post by **reza** » 1/6/2006, 11:47 pm

I just think it's going to be WTFBU, they just want to make sure it won't be a total bomb.

Johnny · Post by **Johnny** » 1/7/2006, 12:08 pm

How is ALS doin in the charts anyways?

Kathy · Post by **Kathy** » 1/7/2006, 12:15 pm

on Edge 102 (Toronto radio), it's #15 on the Thursday 30 (was #14 last week and I'm not sure how high it got)

On MuchMusic it's #17 this week, 18 last week.

It's also on MuchMoreMusic - #14 this week, 15 last week.

Johnny · Post by **Johnny** » 1/7/2006, 1:41 pm

Terrible.

naseoj · Post by **naseoj** » 1/7/2006, 3:59 pm

Kathy14 wrote:on Edge 102 (Toronto radio), it's #15 on the Thursday 30 (was #14 last week and I'm not sure how high it got)

Unfortunately 14 was the highest it ever got.

Kathy · Post by **Kathy** » 1/7/2006, 4:20 pm

Crap - I was hoping that wasn't the case

Johnny · Post by **Johnny** » 1/7/2006, 5:02 pm

Like I said, terrible.

I sense the death of OLP.

Axtech · Post by **Axtech** » 1/7/2006, 5:12 pm

R/I/P