Why "Where Are You" is not #1 on the tracklist?

nikki4982 · Post by **nikki4982** » 7/27/2005, 9:23 am

I wanna seeeeeeeee!!

Rusty · Post by **Rusty** » 7/27/2005, 9:24 am

Remind me next time you're in Canada.

Post by **faninor** » 7/27/2005, 6:56 pm

Where Are You is probably not #1 because they wanted to try something different?

neoncrossing · Post by **neoncrossing** » 7/27/2005, 10:45 pm

all olp records start with a very upbeat edgier song until now with angels...thats what i notice....personally i thought will the future blame us would be perfect for #1 with the way it starts....i think angels is too slow a starter for the cd (although an amazing song nonetheless)

starseed_10 · Post by **starseed_10** » 7/27/2005, 11:11 pm

why this thread title is grammarically uncorrect?

goleafsgo · Post by **goleafsgo** » 7/30/2005, 9:29 pm

I think on the other cds OLP would use their 3rd track as a single... I wonder if they'll do it with Picture...

[edit] oops i'm wrong... my bad

neoncrossing · Post by **neoncrossing** » 7/30/2005, 9:31 pm

potato girl wasnt a single...but from what i've heard of picture, it would make an excellent single....my fave song so far

hedley · Post by **hedley** » 8/2/2005, 4:54 pm

picture is awsome, but angels is just an AMAZING song i would love for it to be a single but i doubt it.

nikki4982 · Post by **nikki4982** » 8/7/2005, 10:43 pm

Rusty wrote:Remind me next time you're in Canada.

You have no idea how badly I wanted to reply to that with "OK, SEE YA TOMORROW!!!". :lol:

Next time. :nod:

Post by **faninor** » 8/8/2005, 1:10 am

nikki4982 wrote:
Rusty wrote:Remind me next time you're in Canada.

You have no idea how badly I wanted to reply to that with "OK, SEE YA TOMORROW!!!".

Next time.

That killed me when I read Rusty's post. :nod:

nikki4982 · Post by **nikki4982** » 8/8/2005, 1:37 am

Matt was sitting behind me when I first read it. We laughed. :nod: