God raised Jesus from the dead (mathematically proven!)

Rusty · Post by **Rusty** » 7/22/2005, 5:29 pm

True, but in her defence she was talking to a guy when she said it.

Korzic · Post by **Korzic** » 7/22/2005, 10:03 pm

Oh FFS its a figure of speech which has been around for years. If you expect everyone to wander around changing it to... "to each his or her own", you are sorely mistaken.

PC has been taken to the extreme and its stupid.

closeyoureyes · Post by **closeyoureyes** » 7/22/2005, 11:28 pm

I don't see how what she said was in any way politically incorrect. Nikki was talking to Corey, who happens to be of the male gender.

Good God people. :lol:

Waiting to Exist · Post by **Waiting to Exist** » 7/22/2005, 11:32 pm

Yes, but she was also referring to herself, doing her own thing. She's a sexist pig and I'll be damned if I'm going to let you guys ignore it!

Rusty · Post by **Rusty** » 7/23/2005, 1:49 am

Dude, your joke not only died it crashed and burned. Let it rest now.

closeyoureyes · Post by **closeyoureyes** » 7/23/2005, 2:08 am

Rusty spoke wisely.

nikki4982 · Post by **nikki4982** » 7/23/2005, 2:43 am

Tom, you really try too hard sometimes.

Post by **xjsb125** » 7/23/2005, 10:37 am

*ball punches Tom*

Axtech · Post by **Axtech** » 7/23/2005, 1:35 pm

Damn, you're one angry, violent old man today.

Waiting to Exist · Post by **Waiting to Exist** » 7/23/2005, 6:59 pm

Johnny · Post by **Johnny** » 7/23/2005, 7:44 pm

Post by **faninor** » 7/24/2005, 12:28 am

Did Tom change his screenname?

nikki4982 · Post by **nikki4982** » 7/24/2005, 12:56 am

Yeah. A few times. Along with his avatar and sig.

I think he's trying to throw us off.

Waiting to Exist · Post by **Waiting to Exist** » 7/24/2005, 4:15 pm

nikki4982 wrote:Yeah. A few times. Along with his avatar and sig.

I think he's trying to throw us off.

I couldn't help myself after reading your complaints in the name changing topic.

goleafsgo · Post by **goleafsgo** » 7/30/2005, 9:33 pm

God (if he/she/it) exist is evil cause he/she/it created math. the end

Rusty · Post by **Rusty** » 7/31/2005, 1:17 am

Now technically God can't be evil. If God represents all that is good and pure, and the laws of balance must apply then God had to create the Devil for the purpose of representing all that is evil and unpure in the world. If God knows all and created all, he must then have knew what he was doing when he made the Devil to create the balance. Now math is good because it is very useful to us and can assist in every day life, but in keeping with the balance it is also evil, because well it sucks and is hard. Therefore the influence of the bad part would come from the Devil and not from God.

[/random statment that was made mostly for the purpose of causing confusion out of boredome]

gravity · Post by **gravity** » 8/22/2005, 5:30 pm

i didnt read the whole thing...but to prove or disprove something, you need to be unbiased...he obviously believed in god to embark on such a fun adventure.

Joe Cooler · Post by **Joe Cooler** » 8/22/2005, 6:46 pm

Not really. Most scientists have an agenda of some sort.

gravity · Post by **gravity** » 8/22/2005, 8:28 pm

but if you believe something exists...its very easy to use what you know to "prove" it...i dont buy this as valid proof of god existing

Joe Cooler · Post by **Joe Cooler** » 8/22/2005, 8:52 pm

Sure. In the same way an evolutionist will search out proof that evolution is truth. In the same way someone who believes in Intelligent Design will do the opposite. It's nothing new.