Superman Decision on : Superman Returns
-
- Oskar Lifetime Achievement Award: 2005
- Posts: 13395
- Joined: 3/13/2002, 12:16 am
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Not only the secretary, but a way more important romance was with Gwen Stacy. Also, I personally don't think Dunst has the proper look, but most of all she doesn't act at all like the Mary Jane Character, she just doesn't pull it off accurately like the other actors. They portray the characters very well. She's okay and I'm not complaining because I really like the movies, I just think there could have been better casting. She's just not one of the most talented actresses. If you compare her acting in all of her roles, she's not very diverse. Another actress similar to her is Gwyneth Paltrow. A lot of critics and just movie fanatics in general are noticing that she was extremely over-rated when she had her oscar nomination. Almost every one of her characters are the exact same. Even when they do have differences, they aren't something spectacular that many other actresses couldn't pull off with ease. That's why they say she's not as castable anymore and isn't getting as many great movie opportunities. (and no it doesn't have anything to do with her child.)
But hey, if she would have never broken up with Brad Pitt, her kid's name would have been APPLE PITT!!
But hey, if she would have never broken up with Brad Pitt, her kid's name would have been APPLE PITT!!

- PeaceEleven
- Posts: 389
- Joined: 3/13/2002, 3:46 am
these super heroes films are always hard to make, I wonder when people find it accurate, My favorite super hero flick has always been the crow, I think it was quite respectfull to the comic book....still though some details aren't in (like the whole scarecrow story) but at least it was filmed and included in the deleted scenes. the more it goes with this superman flick, the worst it gets !??!
Like I have mentioned with the article up here, Spacey for Luthor? Ohh *sigh*
Like I have mentioned with the article up here, Spacey for Luthor? Ohh *sigh*

- PeaceEleven
- Posts: 389
- Joined: 3/13/2002, 3:46 am
- happening fish
- Oskar Winner: 2006
- Posts: 17934
- Joined: 3/17/2002, 11:22 am
- PeaceEleven
- Posts: 389
- Joined: 3/13/2002, 3:46 am
-
- Oskar Winner: 2007
- Posts: 10134
- Joined: 8/16/2003, 2:57 pm
- Location: New Finland
- Gimme_Shelter
- Posts: 3713
- Joined: 5/24/2002, 1:22 am
- Location: The Queen City
- AnnieDreams
- Posts: 4029
- Joined: 8/16/2003, 12:08 pm
- Location: St. John's, Newfoundland
Lando wrote:Not only the secretary, but a way more important romance was with Gwen Stacy. Also, I personally don't think Dunst has the proper look, but most of all she doesn't act at all like the Mary Jane Character, she just doesn't pull it off accurately like the other actors. They portray the characters very well. She's okay and I'm not complaining because I really like the movies, I just think there could have been better casting. She's just not one of the most talented actresses. If you compare her acting in all of her roles, she's not very diverse. Another actress similar to her is Gwyneth Paltrow. A lot of critics and just movie fanatics in general are noticing that she was extremely over-rated when she had her oscar nomination. Almost every one of her characters are the exact same. Even when they do have differences, they aren't something spectacular that many other actresses couldn't pull off with ease. That's why they say she's not as castable anymore and isn't getting as many great movie opportunities. (and no it doesn't have anything to do with her child.)
But hey, if she would have never broken up with Brad Pitt, her kid's name would have been APPLE PITT!!
I thought the Mary Jane wasn't mary-jane-ish too, but I always thought it was more the script's fault than Kirsten Dunst's. It was probably a bit of a combination of both, but if your saying lines the character wouldn't say, it's hard to make them sound like the character.
-Annie (Whee! boring signature!)
Member of the Pokémon League

Member of the Pokémon League
