i dont think i like you...you are thrashing me for having an opinion...you took my statements out of context and "made fun" of me....basically, you are saying that i cant have an opinion because it conflicts with your beliefs of spending money....im trying to rationalize what you do so i can understand it. i dont like spending that money on things i can buy, it seems foolish...and as far as the tools comment, if you read around it you'd see im jokingstarvingeyes wrote:uh oh. your sarcasm has prompted me to behave in a very un chrislike fashion and break out the BRAINS.
"especially since expensive pants are for tools "
"seriously, people spend so much on clothes.....and with the current styles, you can get your clothes at the thrift store and spend A TON less, and the clothes look the same....seriously, who wants FAKE vintage that looks stained and worn but you paid 50 bucks for it? "
- both gravity
"Screw being trendy. Being trendy's stupid"
-nikki4982
gosh, those are value judgements based on a morally subjective act. that's what we refer to around here, in the "damn genius" club as irrational behaviour and JUDGING.
i remember when i was in highschool, there were these kids called BULLIES that liked to judge alot too. they used to say
"look at those fuckin' dirty skids. they shop at value village."
"shopping at the thrift store is stupid"
"inexpensive pants are for fuckin' tools"
gosh, sounds to me like somebody here is juding other people on what they wear. that seems kind of immature and shallow to me. congratulations.
i don't break your balls for wearing your mass produced "same as everybody else" old navy jeans, so don't break mine for not minding spending a little extra to get something a little higher quality and a little different. you have made the extreme error of assuming you can know anything about somebody by the clothes they wear. you can't.
please don't go pushing that well dressed guy in your grade into any lockers, mmmk?
any rebuttals?
no?
cool.
so in summation....double yu tee eff
