Tracklist

Clumsy_Birdman · Post by **Clumsy_Birdman** » 12/4/2004, 11:28 am

ok icount 16 songs on there that piece of paper

the top 4... im guessing are the possibles?
and the other 12 or pretty much definate im guessing again?

maybe they'll release a CD with alot of tracks again, like SM? as Gravity was over before it had begun, it felt

Id always thought and hoped that WIC would make it, and it looks like it has. thats so awesome

would anyone prefer a longer or shorter CD this time around?

id like 13 tracks, dont ask why...

starseed_10 · Post by **starseed_10** » 12/4/2004, 11:30 am

i wont complain if it has 6 tracks as long as they're good.

deniedjunkie · Post by **deniedjunkie** » 12/4/2004, 11:32 am

as long as its quality , it doesnt really matter

i actually like the shorter discs in the 50 minute range

areusad831 · Post by **areusad831** » 12/4/2004, 1:02 pm

spiritual machines was long because of all the kurzweil stuff not songs

neoncrossing · Post by **neoncrossing** » 12/4/2004, 2:26 pm

they have enough material for a 80 min cd so why not do it....make it 16 tracks....i wouldnt mind one bit

it looks like they may release and ep or something with those 4 songs listed above....cause the others were under the album heading....maybe there will be a limited edition bonus ep or something...that would be neat

Post by **xjsb125** » 12/4/2004, 2:32 pm

I think Raine stated in an interview that they didn't want to do a huge cd. They wanted to put maybe 10 songs of the best work they did onto a cd, and explore other avenues for releasing the material that doesn't make it to the album.

Johnny · Post by **Johnny** » 12/4/2004, 2:34 pm

I remember that as well.

Axtech · Post by **Axtech** » 12/4/2004, 2:52 pm

No point guessing. Maybe they're just written down in the order they wrote the songs, or started recording the songs.

Yeah, and SM didn't have any more songs than the first three albums. In fact, it had one less. Also, it had the same number of tracks as Gravity.

Aside from the short RK clips, the album seems to last a lot longer because it's freakin' amazing. Gravity, on the other hand... As such, I'm with the others saying that I'd rather have an album with just a few songs, all high quality, than a really long album that's just slapped together.

happening fish · Post by **happening fish** » 12/4/2004, 3:43 pm

Maybe they'll go back to tradition and put 12 tracks

... right :lol:

olp goin' back to the way things were :lol:

Long Jonny · Post by **Long Jonny** » 12/4/2004, 3:44 pm

but, but, they never had 12 tracks. :Johnathan:

happening fish · Post by **happening fish** » 12/4/2004, 3:47 pm

i meant 11 :cry:

Lando · Post by **Lando** » 12/4/2004, 3:58 pm

drunk!

Post by **faninor** » 12/4/2004, 4:07 pm

I think it's pretty clear that they're using the two papers to determine which songs they will put on the album.
The first paper says:

Not Afraid
Enemy
Talk is Cheap
Hit the Wall

---------
ALBUM
----------

Don't Stop
World on a String
End of the World
Weight of the Lord

The second:

Don't Ask Why
Love & Trust
Picture
World On A String
Vampires
Holy Ghost
Don't Stop
End Of The World
Weight
Walking in Circles
Apology
Save Yourself

The four songs on the first paper below where it says ALBUM are repeated on the second paper, so my guess is the second paper was a list of candidate songs for putting on the album, and in the holiday video they're in the process of going through and selecting which ones from the list on the second page will be used. The top four songs on the first page aren't duplicated on the second page, which I would think means they already know what they're doing with those songs. Either they're definitely not going on the album (in which case, why bother making a list of them?), or they were already planning on putting those songs on the album. That's what it looks like to me anyway . . .

happening fish · Post by **happening fish** » 12/4/2004, 4:08 pm

they sound really... religious :wtf:

Axtech · Post by **Axtech** » 12/4/2004, 4:14 pm

Hey, if it's something he really believes in (despite claims of atheism years ago), maybe it'll lead to some inspired insightful music, rather than the same frustratedly-in-love crap every other band (and Gravity) is pushing out.

Post by **faninor** » 12/4/2004, 4:14 pm

Has nobody commented on the title Don't Stop? I find it amusing.

Lando · Post by **Lando** » 12/4/2004, 4:15 pm

Oh... I forgot to tell everyone. Breaking news is that this is OLP's first Gospel album.

Axtech · Post by **Axtech** » 12/4/2004, 4:16 pm

±faninor² wrote:Has nobody commented on the title Don't Stop? I find it amusing.

First thing I thought of was Emtee's "Don't Start", then RHCP's "Can't Stop".

Then I just stopped caring.

Why do you ask?

megxyz128 · Post by **megxyz128** » 12/4/2004, 4:38 pm

see, i thought of journey's "don't stop believing"

hopefully it's a cover.

Lando · Post by **Lando** » 12/4/2004, 4:41 pm

I don't want anyone covering JOURNEY! They're history's greatest band!!!