Math.

Post by **faninor** » 9/30/2004, 7:41 pm

So basically, in a field every element has to have an additive inverse (something that you can add to it to get 0) 1+0=1, and 1+1=2 (I'm being lazy here, so let's just accept that those are both true) . . . there has to exist an a such that 1+a=0, and since the only numbers are 0, 1, and 2, 1+2=0.

Rusty · Post by **Rusty** » 9/30/2004, 7:42 pm

Random Name wrote:
Rusty wrote:I love my graphing calculator it's ever so good for trig.

What kind of Calc do you have? Most common round these parts is the TI-83+

Yep I sure do got me one of them bad boys! : :mrgreen:

joe_canadian wrote:*head explodes*

I second that.

Chanandler Bong wrote:I won a multiplication trophy when I was in grade four. How cool is that?

That is some cool stuff dude.

Random Name · Post by **Random Name** » 10/1/2004, 1:02 pm

I have a TI 89.

Its the shizznit.

Three dimensional graphs and everything.

Penguin Josh · Post by **Penguin Josh** » 10/1/2004, 3:02 pm

:OOOOOOOOOO

iarecanadian · Post by **iarecanadian** » 10/1/2004, 3:17 pm

Rusty wrote:
Random Name wrote:
Rusty wrote:I love my graphing calculator it's ever so good for trig.

What kind of Calc do you have? Most common round these parts is the TI-83+

Yep I sure do got me one of them bad boys! :

I have a TI-83 plus silver edition. Its spiffy. I love playing games on it during other classes. Its what gets me through the day.......

Random Name · Post by **Random Name** » 10/1/2004, 3:42 pm

Mine still pwns yours.

It factors. Thats impressive damnit.

Rusty · Post by **Rusty** » 10/1/2004, 4:32 pm

Psh, mines the classic graphing calculator of the Ti's it's great.

Random Name · Post by **Random Name** » 10/1/2004, 9:14 pm

classic = old and crapy.

mine does stuff your home computer does.

but in calculator format. 89 is clearly superior to the 83 in so many ways.

Post by **faninor** » 10/1/2004, 9:37 pm

I have a TI 89 also, but it barely gets used.

Sonya · Post by **Sonya** » 10/1/2004, 9:38 pm

random fact to get me another post closer to 2700 for no reason - i failed grade 10 math. :oops:

Johnny · Post by **Johnny** » 10/1/2004, 10:58 pm

I have a caculator from Citi Financial. Beat that bee-yotches!

nikki4982 · Post by **nikki4982** » 10/2/2004, 1:56 am

I can!

I have a calculator from Radio Shack from probably about 1980 that runs on a single AA battery, and I've only had to change the battery like... once. :lol:

Do they even make non-solar calculators anymore?

Penguin Josh · Post by **Penguin Josh** » 10/2/2004, 10:22 am

mine is non solar, but it is a ti 83+

Mechanical Thought · Post by **Mechanical Thought** » 10/2/2004, 10:30 am

Random Name wrote:I have a TI 89.

Its the shizznit.

Three dimensional graphs and everything.

starseed_10 · Post by **starseed_10** » 10/2/2004, 3:08 pm

damn. i dont even know if those were allowed at my school.

Random Name · Post by **Random Name** » 10/2/2004, 3:09 pm

They wern't. You couldn't use them on exams. 8-)

Rusty · Post by **Rusty** » 10/2/2004, 5:21 pm

My dad got pissed when they wouldn't let me use it in grade 9 science. He phoned the school and asked before I got it, if i could use it for science they said yes, I get to science and they say I can't use it.

Penguin Josh · Post by **Penguin Josh** » 10/2/2004, 5:30 pm

haha, what were you taking for science in grade nine?

Rusty · Post by **Rusty** » 10/2/2004, 5:35 pm

Umm, we were just doing random calculations for chemistry and stuff that was too large to do in your head, so i had to get a new calculator for that class :neutral:

Penguin Josh · Post by **Penguin Josh** » 10/2/2004, 5:49 pm

i love my ti83+ it can do quadratic equations on its own