This thread is important.

Lando · Post by **Lando** » 8/14/2003, 1:56 am

Shut up everyone. The CM is fine. CALLED IT!

xoNoDoubt69 · Post by **xoNoDoubt69** » 8/14/2003, 1:59 am

Axtech · Post by **Axtech** » 8/14/2003, 5:51 am

... and that's why Lando is godess of the CM.

robcore · Post by **robcore** » 8/14/2003, 9:01 am

There's nothign we can do anymore, lando called it.

call me andrew · Post by **call me andrew** » 8/14/2003, 9:13 am

Narbus wrote:
OLPMazurite wrote:
teelow wrote:What needs to stop: (IMHO)
But if you have a sig like bort8 or xonodoubt69 or OLPMazurite you piss off every person who is unable to access high speed internet, because it sloooooows uuuuuuus dooooown. THANKS FOR UNDERSTANDING.

uh
1. my signature is not long
2. I am not changing it. sorry

love,
Bethany

Just now, in this post, your sig doubled the size of your post. If your sig accounts for half of your post, even after you've quoted someone, then I'd say it's a bit large, yes.

yes. i'll make you a tutorial.

how to know you're sig is too friggin' big a tutorial by andrew

1. you put line breaks in your sig.
2. the image in your sig is taller than 150 pixels (width doesnt really matter)
3. you have an entire song's lyrics in it.
4. it doubles your average post size.

Sufjan Stevens · Post by **Sufjan Stevens** » 8/14/2003, 9:55 am

I don't understand why everyone is having such a huge problem with shrinking their signature sizes. If you want to fight, pick something better than the length of your song lyrics. Mine is what, like five lines, and I put a link in the lyrics to my journal. I think that's fine. If you have like 10 links in your signature along with pictures and song lyrics, try to add some of them together. Put the links in your song lyrics. If it honestly means that much to you to have a link to your favorite three journals, band websites, and other things, just add the links to something else. It saves space.

Lando · Post by **Lando** » 8/14/2003, 4:07 pm

Don't say anything Alan. I already called it.

teelow · Post by **teelow** » 8/14/2003, 11:24 pm

Hey Alan its probably/mainly me that has the problem with sig lengths, I don't expcet everyone to change just for me. Its pointless. Its just a few things I needed to speak out about.

And hey, I'm done with the debating here. nikki, i'll PM you and we can discuss stuff later. Once the PM thing is working again. I had to type a PM twice to areyousaad and lost it twice. Very frustrating.

Anyways, anything else want to add?

teelow · Post by **teelow** » 8/14/2003, 11:26 pm

Oh, and Alan...your sig is great! :lol:

Sufjan Stevens · Post by **Sufjan Stevens** » 8/15/2003, 12:32 pm

Everyone loves the Matt Skiba.

superboots · Post by **superboots** » 8/15/2003, 1:28 pm

you know
we have names
and if you READ OUR SIGNATURES, you wouldn't have to call us by our freaking user names

nelison · Post by **nelison** » 8/15/2003, 1:46 pm

we should just have our names as our user names...
or right under our user names.
I mean if user names are pointless why have them

teelow · Post by **teelow** » 8/15/2003, 3:15 pm

Bethany: Don't tell me you took that as an insult too. :roll:

Narbus · Post by **Narbus** » 8/15/2003, 9:24 pm

OLPMazurite wrote:you know
we have names
and if you READ OUR SIGNATURES, you wouldn't have to call us by our freaking user names

right here your sig TRIPLED the size of your post.

Just thought you'd like to know.

Long Jonny · Post by **Long Jonny** » 8/15/2003, 9:44 pm

ya know what mr. teelow?

After reading your post, I want to do everything you said you wanted the CM'ers not to do- just to piss you off. I don't know you- have never talked to you- but if people want to change their usernames, let them change them. If they want to try and promote another band- let them. I do it for OLP on some other boards. Who cares? If they want to have a pic (of a reasonable size), who are you to say no?

Also, if the thread about checking out Matt Good's music is in the Non-OLP related discussion, where's the problem? There is no problem.

Sorry, I had to put my two cents in!

Have a good day!

areusad831 · Post by **areusad831** » 8/15/2003, 10:34 pm

Narbus wrote:
OLPMazurite wrote:you know
we have names
and if you READ OUR SIGNATURES, you wouldn't have to call us by our freaking user names

right here your sig TRIPLED the size of your post.

Just thought you'd like to know.

and your point?

Ignignokt · Post by **Ignignokt** » 8/15/2003, 11:08 pm

people with 56k need to stop crying and live in the present and get freakin broadband
christ

56k came out what, in like 94-95? jeez

:wtf:

teelow · Post by **teelow** » 8/16/2003, 12:41 am

Narbus: Thanks, but I don't want to perphasly make people mad, if you agree with what I suggested, thats great! But lets try and be calm and non insulting as much as possible bro, thanks. 8-)

Rainedude: Grow up. Come back when you have somethign insightful to add. You're trying to rile me up, and its not going to work.
Bloodryan: Easier said than done. For, high speed providers are not foolish. They realise that sending their cables far out of the city to where houses are far apart and the cost would be more than what is earned.

Or I could move to the city. :uh:

Axtech · Post by **Axtech** » 8/16/2003, 7:03 am

Teelow: My solution for you...

The broccoli must die!

Joey · Post by **Joey** » 8/16/2003, 9:21 am

I can't afford cable internet

Since I have to pay for everything myself, I'll have to do without highspeed for awhile
56k is just fine for right now .. this is the only site I ever have problems with

:nod:

ClumsyMonkey.net

This thread is important.

Teelo...

Re: This thread is important.