Posted: 10/13/2005, 12:33 am
kyle wellwood is the man
he looked pretty good last game
but Alexander Steen has also been pretty solid
and their was only room for one of them
Page 19 of 57
Posted: 10/13/2005, 12:56 am
Posted: 10/13/2005, 1:01 am
they should get rid of pocahontas
Posted: 10/13/2005, 1:12 am
i wont argue with that
ponikanoanisskiesss
ponikanoanisskiesss
Posted: 10/13/2005, 1:19 am
i just felt like calling him pocahontas
cuz grapes did
i laughed
cuz grapes did
i laughed
Posted: 10/13/2005, 1:21 am
that was pretty damn funny
Posted: 10/13/2005, 3:07 am
ha
they should get rid of belak or berg. and call up colaiacovo
they should get rid of belak or berg. and call up colaiacovo
Posted: 10/13/2005, 3:16 am
i would get rid of Berg way before Belak
Posted: 10/13/2005, 4:20 am
GOLDBERG? He's an awesome goalie fools!
Posted: 10/13/2005, 6:18 pm
but if they get rid of pocahontas, berg and belak and bring in guys like wellwood and colavavacacacihyohiohhio then they'll have a team worth paying 
its not right
its not right
Posted: 10/13/2005, 8:27 pm
Belak doesnt bother me much actually
he hasnt taken stupid penalties like he did last season
he's physical
he isnt a great defenseman or anything but not bad for a 5th or 6th guy
but Berg just pisses me off every game, stupid play after stupid play
the guy doesnt seem to know how to pick up a man infront of the net
he hasnt taken stupid penalties like he did last season
he's physical
he isnt a great defenseman or anything but not bad for a 5th or 6th guy
but Berg just pisses me off every game, stupid play after stupid play
the guy doesnt seem to know how to pick up a man infront of the net
Posted: 10/13/2005, 8:30 pm
IMO they'd be better served w/o both of them on the blueline heh
Posted: 10/13/2005, 8:36 pm
ya but who would fill the 2 spots, they can call up Colaiacovo
and other then that they would have to make trades
and i dont think anybody wants what they have to offer
"alright we'll give you Berg and Belak. Do you want to give us someone who doesnt suck?"
then again they could maybe talk to the Islanders, those idiots will make any trade
and other then that they would have to make trades
and i dont think anybody wants what they have to offer
"alright we'll give you Berg and Belak. Do you want to give us someone who doesnt suck?"
then again they could maybe talk to the Islanders, those idiots will make any trade
Posted: 10/13/2005, 8:38 pm
yes coley's a start.. and then after that.. they had the opportunity to like... buy out belak and berg and acquire one like.. good player to play d
Posted: 10/13/2005, 8:43 pm
they tried to get a few but they ended up going other places
like Aucoin, i would have loved to see him in Toronto
like Aucoin, i would have loved to see him in Toronto
Posted: 10/13/2005, 8:46 pm
they just need a guy like dandenault in mtl
a guy who can play decent D and is mobile and they'd be set
a guy who can play decent D and is mobile and they'd be set
Posted: 10/13/2005, 8:54 pm
true, but i am glad they didnt do something stupid like go and get Niedermayer
not with his paycheck
not with his paycheck
Posted: 10/13/2005, 8:59 pm
aucoin's isnt much better in the long run
i mean to get him they'd have to pay a lot
same with foote etc
which is why i liked the dandenault move by gainey
i mean to get him they'd have to pay a lot
same with foote etc
which is why i liked the dandenault move by gainey
Posted: 10/13/2005, 9:11 pm
true
the last defenseman i heard being mentioned around Toronto was restricted free agent Nick Boynton but he just resigned with Boston
the last defenseman i heard being mentioned around Toronto was restricted free agent Nick Boynton but he just resigned with Boston
Posted: 10/13/2005, 9:14 pm
boynton wouldnt work
they love him in boston
you'd be more likely to get hal gill then nick and that just wouldnt work anyways
they love him in boston
you'd be more likely to get hal gill then nick and that just wouldnt work anyways