ClumsyMonkey.net

Hot Fuzz




Awesome.

Debbie Does Dallas. In Blu-Ray.

Ok I really didn't. An associate up at the store told me he's waiting for this to actually come out, and it made me laugh.

Narnia was so freaking sweet.

agreed. possibly better than the first one

Well that's not hard, since the first one wasn't very good to begin with.

Well you are just wrong there, now arn't cha?


PS, why didn't I go with you, Saman? I'm a skeet. If I go see it a second time, I might drag you.

lol i know! what the heck? that's okay though, i dragged my brother along with me. i do kinda wanna see forgetting sarah marshall, if you're still up for a movie

too much wiener in forgetting sarah marshall! still a pretty good movie though.

I like when they show dick - it means that at least some men are willing to get naked for the cameras, instead of it always being just women I always thought the tables were a little tipped the wrong way

Guys dont like watching movies when man junk is in full display. :I

That logic doesn't work.

I want to see Narnia, although I was a little disappointed with the first one. I'm about to buy tickets to see Indiana Jones w/ my family this weekend.

myownsatellite wrote:I like when they show dick - it means that at least some men are willing to get naked for the cameras, instead of it always being just women I always thought the tables were a little tipped the wrong way

over time, yeah, things have definitely been more common for females to go topless. However, lately, there aren't a lot of movies with boobs in them... still more than penises, but, the whole male/female genitalia thing is a bit different, it was a huge scandalous event when Sharon Stone first showed her vagina in Basic Instinct. So I'd say that going topless and showing a penis or a vagina are much different to audiences and filmmakers alike. There are women who fight for equal rights to go topless because men are able to. Other than for perhaps some extremist nudists, you aren't hearing about people trying to make it legal for men and women to walk around without any pants or underwear on...

I'm not saying I want to see more vaginas on film... but I just think that showing a woman topless isn't as big of a deal as showing the male/female genitalia!

That's just cause men don't have anything to compare it to. So much of our bodies are parts we have to cover up while you have a relatively small (ha ha ha) area to hide.

men don't have anything to compare it to because women going topless isn't accepted everywhere in the world...

Women's breasts are much more sexualized than men's chests, that is why they are considered "private" parts. Therefore, men's genitalia may be different from that of women (we have two areas, you have one), but that doesn't make it any less of a sexual area than men's penises. Women who go topless in movies are considered sluts; men who go bottomless in movies are heroes. Where does the distinction end?

I'd rather see more naked men and less naked women in my movies. It would, as I said before, even out the playing field for once.

Just because men don't like male genitalia doesn't mean women don't want to see it. That logic is flawed - if you notice, women make up half the world's population Are you of the opinion that our wants don't matter?

myownsatellite wrote:... men who go bottomless in movies are heroes.

Dennis Franz is my hero and all but not because he went botmless.

myownsatellite wrote:Women's breasts are much more sexualized than men's chests, that is why they are considered "private" parts. Therefore, men's genitalia may be different from that of women (we have two areas, you have one), but that doesn't make it any less of a sexual area than men's penises.

this isn't true, like I said, to audiences according the media and society in general, the vagina and penis are considered much more taboo or private than a woman's breasts.

just because men only have one private part doesn't make it the same as women's breasts.

exactly.

boobs have become desexualized if anything. it's really not a big deal to see them anymore.

genitalia is much more sexual...and thus, more taboo. think about the uses, for one thing. and really, women's breasts are just like men's chests, with the addition of some fat, tissue and glands.

seeing more penises would not level out the playing field. if you want level, let's see some more vagina to make up for seeing more penises!

seriously. you can't equate boobs as being genitalia. sure, they're private, but nowhere near as much as genitalia.

I don't mind if people get to see more wieners... if that's what girls want to see, so be it, but comparing that to boobs is just soooo inaccurate in comparison.

also, you're completely 100% right about boobs becoming more desexualized as time goes on.

Iron Man. I enjoyed it very much.

Not a movie, but Heather and I just finished the Planet Earth series on sexy Blu-Ray. Great series.