Page 1 of 3
Weapons of Mass Destruction
Posted: 6/28/2004, 9:52 pm
by nikki4982
So, I got a letter from the senate in the mail today in response to something I had sent through TrueMajority regarding "bunker busters"... read the whole thing. If you're American and planning on voting for Bush, hopefully this'll change your mind.
70 times Hiroshima.
Posted: 6/28/2004, 9:55 pm
by joe_canadian
The hypocrisy of the US military developing and possessing WMD's whilst simultaneously damning and destroying other countries for possessing them makes my head spin.
Posted: 6/28/2004, 10:30 pm
by nikki4982
You and me both.
Posted: 6/28/2004, 10:49 pm
by Bandalero
i am so writing my congressmen and women. i want to know who is responsible for blocking this man and if it is my own senators, they will have hell to pay in texas.
Posted: 6/28/2004, 11:47 pm
by Johnny
Thats just sad.
Posted: 6/29/2004, 4:52 am
by Smooke
Bush needs to smarten up. Like what he fuck this is not Tonka trucks he's dealing with. It's Weapons 70 times more powerful than the Hiroshima Atomic Bomb. What does this mean? if it gets into the wrong hands it could start a full fledge Nuclear war therefore wiping out most of the human population.
Man, Bush pisses me off! I never knew about this!
Posted: 6/29/2004, 6:30 am
by Axtech
Gets in the wrong hands? Bush already has them.
Posted: 6/29/2004, 8:14 am
by Penguin Josh
and
*shakes fist at bush*
Posted: 6/29/2004, 5:58 pm
by nikki4982
If he's elected again... we're all screwed.
Posted: 6/29/2004, 6:17 pm
by I AM ME
actually We'll all be screwed.
It's everywhere other then America that needs to be worried
Posted: 6/29/2004, 6:33 pm
by One-Eye
I... have no words.
What planet do you have to be on for Dubya's logic to make ANY KIND OF SENSE?
Posted: 6/29/2004, 6:42 pm
by I AM ME
Bible Belt
Posted: 6/29/2004, 6:44 pm
by One-Eye
That NEEDS its own planet.
Posted: 6/29/2004, 7:53 pm
by Cole
I don't understand the war in Iraq at all. They say they went to Iraq because they have 'weapons of mass destruction' (but so do they, and who are they to say that it's alright for them, but no one else?), and they need to 'fight the war on terror' (I think what you guys need is a president who knows the difference between 'terror' and 'terrorism')... Besides, no 'weapons of mass destruction' were ever found in Iraq, and if the US was really afraid of them having 'weapons of mass destruction', where would they get them from? Russia. And they would have went to Russia and said, 'Hey, stop giving these guys 'weapons of mass destruction''. But did you hear any of that? No. What we did hear, is that the first place the American soldiers went to in Iraq, was the oil fields.
Therefore, in my opinion, Bush is the terrorist. Or 'terror', as he would say.
Posted: 6/29/2004, 8:53 pm
by nikki4982
I AM ME wrote:actually We'll all be screwed.
It's everywhere other then America that needs to be worried
No no... when I said "we're all screwed" I meant "we" as in the entire freaking world.
Posted: 6/29/2004, 9:39 pm
by Johnny
So i guess that means that The Daisy Cutters arent strong enough anymore.
Posted: 6/30/2004, 2:45 pm
by Cole
someone will assassinate him sooner or later
Posted: 6/30/2004, 4:30 pm
by lemonphile4
That's not how it works. As long as a president does what he is told, he'll be protected.
Posted: 6/30/2004, 8:26 pm
by nikki4982
*stabs stupid US government* I hate my country.
Posted: 6/30/2004, 8:28 pm
by joe_canadian
Seriously, can any pro-Busher explain how this is not morbid hypocrisy?
This really perturbs me.