Page 1 of 1
Do you believe that this was previously legitimate?
Posted: 6/24/2003, 10:17 am
by Corey
Posted: 6/24/2003, 10:34 am
by mosaik
you mean previously there was no law against this?
Posted: 6/24/2003, 10:39 am
by Corey
I'm sorry... yes.. that is what I meant.
Posted: 6/24/2003, 10:42 am
by mosaik
that astounds me.
how did they miss making this illegal?
Posted: 6/24/2003, 10:47 am
by happening fish
i thought you didn't believe in laws
Posted: 6/24/2003, 11:30 am
by mosaik
heh, well, you know, i don't really.
there's nothing inherently irrational about a law against voyeurism, however.
and mostly my shock comes from the fact that the state, which loves to make laws, missed this one.
Posted: 6/24/2003, 12:22 pm
by curtman16
^Well, they have laws for about every other freakin' thing, you'd think they'd miss one every now and then.