Page 1 of 1

WOMEN!! Earn $$$$ at home! No risk!

Posted: 4/25/2003, 9:59 am
by starvingeyes
http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/stor ... 8998c.html

Woman pleads no-contest to rape-blackmail attempt
By Mareva Brown -- Bee Staff Writer
Published 2:15 a.m. PDT Tuesday, April 22, 2003

A North Sacramento woman who tried to blackmail eight men into paying her so she wouldn't report that they raped her -- an allegation she made up -- pleaded no-contest to multiple counts of extortion, filing false police reports and sending threatening letters, prosecutors announced Monday.
Jessica Langshaw, 20, accused each of the men of sexually assaulting her in separate incidents over 18 months in which she either knew them as friends or was romantically involved with them, according to prosecutor Michael Blazina.

Then she had demanded specific amounts of blackmail from each man, ranging from $8,000 to $150,000, for a total of about $500,000, Blazina said. In some cases, Langshaw also demanded they give her their motorcycles, in exchange for her agreement not to press criminal sexual-assault charges, he added.
The men ranged from a 71-year-old college professor to a 25-year-old shock disc jockey to a group of men that Langshaw met in an Internet chat room. In five cases, she delivered letters of demand to the men. In two cases, she mailed letters to the men's parents. In the eighth case, she read a demand letter over the telephone.

"Just the sheer volume of her claims tended to erode her credibility," Blazina said.

Langshaw's claims began to fall apart when rape investigators from several different regional law-enforcement agencies met for a routine meeting and discovered that Langshaw had made reports in unrelated cases.

At about the same time, arson investigators looking at burned cars outside the homes of two of the men were told the men had received demand letters from Langshaw a short time earlier.

Langshaw's boyfriend, Raul Umana, 28, also pleaded no-contest to three felony counts of attempted extortion and three felony counts of sending threatening letters. As part of a plea agreement, prosecutors agreed that Umana would receive no more than two years in state prison.

Langshaw pleaded no-contest to six felony counts of extortion, five felony counts of sending threatening letters and three misdemeanor counts of falsely reporting crimes to law enforcement. She will be sentenced to no more than one year in Sacramento County jail, according to the plea agreement. Both defendants will be sentenced June 13.

Posted: 4/25/2003, 11:06 am
by Corey
Calling rape is almost as bad as the disgusting crime itself. I can't believe anyone would do that to another human being.

On another note, isn't a blackmail letter a stupid way to threaten rape charges? If it ever went to court, couldn't the guy just use that as evidence in their defense?

Posted: 4/25/2003, 11:08 am
by I AM ME
you'd think so

Posted: 4/25/2003, 11:42 am
by starvingeyes
i think the fact that she used blackmail letters is why she's in court. :)

Posted: 4/25/2003, 12:13 pm
by Corey
That is what I figured but...

Langshaw's claims began to fall apart when rape investigators from several different regional law-enforcement agencies met for a routine meeting and discovered that Langshaw had made reports in unrelated cases.


The "investigators" are trying to make it sound like they dug up some dirt on her when she practically turned herself in by sending letters out.

Posted: 4/28/2003, 3:49 pm
by Odin
Why is this in the politics forum instead of the serious discussion forum?

Posted: 4/28/2003, 5:00 pm
by Corey
Why is video games chat in the serious disussion forum?

Posted: 4/28/2003, 5:06 pm
by Sufjan Stevens
This does have to do with politics, seeing that....I don't know, just keep it here. It's interesting, and anything that actually can be discussed without talking about Andrew Antoine belongs in this forum.

Posted: 4/28/2003, 5:10 pm
by Corey
And technically this is the "Current Events Forum"

Re: WOMEN!! Earn $$$$ at home! No risk!

Posted: 5/6/2003, 12:07 pm
by soccerchick
starving eyes wrote:Langshaw's boyfriend, Raul Umana, 28, also pleaded no-contest to three felony counts of attempted extortion and three felony counts of sending threatening letters. As part of a plea agreement, prosecutors agreed that Umana would receive no more than two years in state prison.

Langshaw pleaded no-contest to six felony counts of extortion, five felony counts of sending threatening letters and three misdemeanor counts of falsely reporting crimes to law enforcement. She will be sentenced to no more than one year in Sacramento County jail, according to the plea agreement. Both defendants will be sentenced June 13.


Doesn't anybody else have a problem with Langshaw's boyfriend getting no more than 2 years for 6 felony counts, and Langshaw only getting no more than one year for eleven felony counts, plus three misdemeanor counts? What's going on here?

Posted: 5/6/2003, 12:28 pm
by happening fish
At the same time I'm pretty fucking offended by the title of this thread, implying that all women have the capacity for this sort of shit. Hey buddy, fuck you.

</bad mood rant>

Posted: 5/6/2003, 1:00 pm
by mosaik
i think Chris meant the title as a joke.

Posted: 5/6/2003, 1:01 pm
by Sufjan Stevens
Uh oh, the wrath of Alex is back.

Anyways, that's how it goes with law soccerchick. Women get lesser charges for anything that pertains to jailtime. They can commit the same crime, if not, more, and get an easier term than the male, because men can handle it, I suppose.

Look at this case. Michigan roads are always under construction, it's just how it is here, because we suck. Anyways, there are signs everywhere saying "Injure/kill a worker and get 15 years and a $7500 fine." Well, a woman ON A SUSPENDED LICENSE hit some one and killed the person. Her punishment? The fine, no jail time, and some community service. I am tempted to spraypaint on the signs "Unless you're a woman" because that is what the Michigan state government says. If you're a woman, you can get away with murder.

Posted: 5/6/2003, 1:09 pm
by Bandalero
oh man don't i know it, why is it people were bitching at Texas for putting a fucking woman to death? she deserved it, she was put there by a jury of her peers. why do we treat women with special privlages in our justice system? you want equal rights then you should have the same right to die for doing something stupid.

Posted: 5/6/2003, 1:10 pm
by starvingeyes
alex, babe, it was a spoof on one of those spam emails. there is no need for all the rage. my point here is that all women could do this sort of thing if they wanted to, not that all women would do.

Posted: 5/6/2003, 2:27 pm
by happening fish
Yeah I know, I just have a huge exam tomorrow that is 80% of my final mark and I'm really stressed to pieces and needed something to bitch about. Sorry :D

Posted: 5/11/2003, 8:35 am
by Neil
Corey wrote:And technically this is the "Current Events Forum"


*also a reply to other post about the video game thing*

who knows....