ClumsyMonkey.net

Well, at least we agree on something.

Doug Bin Laden wrote:Corey, how do you know? What if they painted a pretty picture for you about how canada has been hiding weapons of mass destruction in the Canadian shield for the last decade.

the canadian pm has been known to make anti-american remarks. so have members of his cabinet. and the 9/11 heroes/terrorists came through the canadian border.

we're a rogue state. better invade. how can i believe that you'd stand up to them then when you won't now?

You just changed the situation. Besides, there are no sanctions or treaty resolutions against Canada not to build such weapons. (as far as I know)

capo, half a million causalties are expected in the first few days of your campaign. I don't think leaving Saddam alone could create that many deaths in 48 hours.

corey:

there aren't any sanctions/regulations yet, but the USA could make some up.

and you don't need proof that we've got bombs. you just need to hear the government say we do.

Capo, stop contradicting yourself.

First you said that the US is doing this to help the Iraqis, then you said that Bush has the right to control the country and do whatever the hell he wants with it, take their oil because he 'deserves it', just because he won the war and killed more people than his enemies.

Tell me, how is being invaded and controled by another country for as long as that country chooses going to 'help' the Iraqi people? Yep, real freedom.

we have lots of bomb grade uranium thats been shipped here from Russia and the states for use in the CANDU reactors so we have the capabilities to build em and we already have the technology/knowledge to build em...
that in itself is more info than what the american govt has in terms of info on saddam's attempts at becoming a nuclear power

Doug Bin Laden wrote:uhm, reno, i hate to tell you this but your bombs can't tell if the iraqi they just killed was pro or anti saddam.

if you want to help the revolution, fine. meet with some of the leaders and give them some money. why doesn't your government pursue that option? because they don't WANT a free iraq. They want a UNITED STATES iraq.

because you bitch and moan when we do that as well. nothings right according to you. your going to bitch and moan about how were funding terrorist that are going to kill innocent civilians in Iraq and what not. either way your going to turn it around and make it look like the US is wrong.

And you're going to turn it around and make it look like Iraq is wrong.

no one is right or wrong in war, they just have their issues and fight for them.

reno_ruelas wrote:because you bitch and moan when we do that as well. nothings right according to you. your going to bitch and moan about how were funding terrorist that are going to kill innocent civilians in Iraq and what not. either way your going to turn it around and make it look like the US is wrong.

you're right, likely i would. in truth the americans wouldn't pick the new leader of iraq based on any criteria other then "how much will he be willing to get on his knees and suck our red white and blue dicks?"

whether or not he liked to line up women on sundays and shoot them into trenches wouldn't even cross the white houses collective mind.

and in war, everybody's wrong.

right, that's why everyone has their own elections and in fact tha majority of elections are overseen through the UN. the majority of people in the coucil overseeing the elections are from Japan. we have no input on who anybody elects.

we'll see about that. the new leader of iraq, elected or otherwise, will be sympathetic to america's interests.

they might be thankful, but they got to rebuild a whole country, and won't have time to kiss ass. hopefully we can send economists there and make them as strong as they once were.

anyway, letting the iraqi's rebel was not the course your government decided on. they've decided to kill thousands instead, may they rot in hell for all eternity because of it.

oh but they did, and they were put into camps. and while they were there their houses were dozed and all their belongings sold. when they were realeased they found a mound of rock where their houses used to be.

Reno do you think that the USA would act any different if you & your ten friends decided to overthrow them?

i'm pretty sure they kill you for it in america.

oh yeah...they sure would. they are so hateful toward US vigalanties that there is an old army base in Alabama that was sold to an individual who trains these types of people. considering that in texas alone there is the "republic of texas" and other crazies all over the country, they are just undersurvailance and when they amass way too many weapons they get raided and put in jail....not killed like sadamn does.

reno if you tried to OVERTHROW the government, that is, march on washington, they would shoot yoru ass dead.

and last i checked owning guns was a constitutional right and not a crime.

oh and these groups don't want to do that...they just run around old army bases cause they like playing army? the thing the FBI does is make sure that these groups don't get too big to start an uprising. they would have a really hard time getting ready, stockpiling guns and ammo, and then assemble to march into washington.

and your right it is a right to carry a gun, however, conspiracy to overthrow the government is not.

well that's because america isn't so orwellian that we have thought police.

yet.

hollow minds

you have got to be the most ignorant piece of monkey shit ive ever seen leave a msg on here ever. OF COURSE WE CAN OWN GUNS..... you just cant go around using them to kill people...... and if someone were to try to overthrow the gov, yea theyd get killed. thats called TREASON. the same damn thing would happen in Canada too. you need to fucking either learn some politics and the way things work or just keep your damn mouth shut.
you're as ignorant as you are fuckin annoying.