
I'm giving a speech to several hundred senior citizens this week, fun times, I'm nervous as hell.
starving eyes wrote:and when the liberal government increases social security benefits, are they not forcing their abritrary "morals" on me?
You know, I hope they abolish social security, so you can see what America would be like with all but the luckiest disabled and elderly individuals destitute and homeless.
[emphasis mine]Wouldn't that be great; then you wouldn't have to pay a miniscule percentage of your salary to help your fellow humans.
There is a difference between religious morality and societal morality. Societal morality answers to no higher being, it merely helps society run smoothly.
If you want the benefits of living in a civilized society, you must pay taxes to help it run.
If this is immoral to you, fine, LEAVE. No one's keeping you here against your will.
There is a difference between religious morality and societal morality. Societal morality answers to no higher being, it merely helps society run smoothly. If you want the benefits of living in a civilized society, you must pay taxes to help it run. If this is immoral to you, fine, LEAVE. No one's keeping you here against your will.
starving eyes wrote:You know, I hope they abolish social security, so you can see what America would be like with all but the luckiest disabled and elderly individuals destitute and homeless.
a. it is not my responsibility to look after the elderly, disabled, poor etc. it is theirs.
b. actually, social security, welfare, living wages etc. are all policies which harm the economy and create unemployment. have you ever heard of the term "welfare wall"?[emphasis mine]Wouldn't that be great; then you wouldn't have to pay a miniscule percentage of your salary to help your fellow humans.
yes, it would be great if i didn't have to pay a miniscule percentage of my salary to help my fellow humans. note the emphasis here. my objection is that i am being told that i have to do something with my salary. if i choose to pay said percentage, it is a different story.There is a difference between religious morality and societal morality. Societal morality answers to no higher being, it merely helps society run smoothly.
in your, albeit uneducated, opinion it helps society run smoothly. it does not. and whether or not the morals being forced upon me answer to a "higher being" is irrelevant. i am still having the morals of other people forced upon me.If you want the benefits of living in a civilized society, you must pay taxes to help it run.
once again, in <i>your opinion</i> civilized society cannot run without taxation. i disagree, and i have support for my assertions. greater and deeper support for them then you do for yours, as you will find should you continue this discussion.If this is immoral to you, fine, LEAVE. No one's keeping you here against your will.
ah, so if the mafia moves into my neighbourhood and begins demanding protection money, i am to assume that it is <i>my responsibility</i> to leave, not theirs? no. i will <i>not leave</i>. i own, or rather my parents <i>own</i>, the land on which i live. i <i>own</i> my money. it is <i>my decision on how these things will be used</i>, not the states. <i>they</i> are wrong, not me. it is them who must leave.
crystal baller wrote:There is a difference between religious morality and societal morality. Societal morality answers to no higher being, it merely helps society run smoothly. If you want the benefits of living in a civilized society, you must pay taxes to help it run. If this is immoral to you, fine, LEAVE. No one's keeping you here against your will.
what is "societal morality"? how is it determined? is "societal morality" an objective set of clearly defined rules by which i and all other men must live?
If a sex shop opens up in your backyard, do you move or petition the city to have your neighborhood rezoned? if the mob moves in down your street and starts strongarming the citizens of your block, do you move or do you request police assistance?
i'm not leaving. it's them who should leave me alone.
starving eyes wrote:You know, I hope they abolish social security, so you can see what America would be like with all but the luckiest disabled and elderly individuals destitute and homeless.
a. it is not my responsibility to look after the elderly, disabled, poor etc. it is theirs.
b. actually, social security, welfare, living wages etc. are all policies which harm the economy and create unemployment. have you ever heard of the term "welfare wall"?[emphasis mine]Wouldn't that be great; then you wouldn't have to pay a miniscule percentage of your salary to help your fellow humans.
yes, it would be great if i didn't have to pay a miniscule percentage of my salary to help my fellow humans. note the emphasis here. my objection is that i am being told that i have to do something with my salary. if i choose to pay said percentage, it is a different story.
Societal morality is just that: morals agreed upon by society. You are part of society; you have just as many votes as anyone else, you can help choose what our society will value. If the majority disagrees with you, work harder to change their opinions. Run for office. It is not "them" who are against you, it is that "they" have worked their asses off to get the majority to vote their way. You have the ability to do your damndest to to the same. Then you would be "them", and you could help make the rules. This idea that "they" are somehow an oppressive force that you have no say in is a myth.
I don't know what point you're making about "them" leaving you alone, perhaps you should clarify it for me. What it seems like you're saying is, if something like a sex shop or a mafia movies in, you should call upon the government to have it taken care of, without your having to move. I agree; that is why the government is there. But then you turn around and say you don't want a government? This makes no sense; please clarify.