The Dom, Claire, Rusty n' Emily Thread

beautiful liar · Post by **beautiful liar** » 3/7/2005, 6:56 pm

i'll leave if you ask me to

beautiful liar · Post by **beautiful liar** » 3/7/2005, 6:56 pm

mind my own business

beautiful liar · Post by **beautiful liar** » 3/7/2005, 6:56 pm

and speak when i'm spoken to

beautiful liar · Post by **beautiful liar** » 3/7/2005, 6:57 pm

i am the tower around which you orbited

beautiful liar · Post by **beautiful liar** » 3/7/2005, 6:57 pm

i am not proud i am just taken orders

beautiful liar · Post by **beautiful liar** » 3/7/2005, 6:57 pm

i fall to the ground within hours of impact

beautiful liar · Post by **beautiful liar** » 3/7/2005, 6:57 pm

i hit back when hit

beautiful liar · Post by **beautiful liar** » 3/7/2005, 6:57 pm

and attack when attacked

Rusty · Post by **Rusty** » 3/7/2005, 8:44 pm

Did you read my response Claire?

beautiful liar · Post by **beautiful liar** » 3/7/2005, 11:16 pm

Rusty wrote:Since I don't have an account to post a comment there I shall post it here. Simple as pie....wow I could go for pie right about now.... *ahem* anyway here we go:

"I might not agree with what you smoke, but I believe in your right to take a toke."

I like that line. Very nice way to end it. You make a very strong arguement for the legalization of it. I agree with the legalization it would benefit the economy, and cut the "drug wars" down a lot. People would be sure of what they were getting so it would be safer and provided it was sold under controlled circumstances like alchohol is in special stores it would work very well. The only problem with the legalization of it is, what about someone driving under the influence of pot? It's easy to take a quick breathalizer(sp) (forgive my horrid spelling/most likely improper word). Now of course it's easy to smell pot on someone. But that isn't a scientific way of proving they are stoned. Laws demand police to have a scientific check. The only way known to scientifically check for drug use now is a blood test. The police cannot take a blood test because it infringes on our rights. So how do you propose that, the obstacle of drivining under the influence of marijuana be tackled?

i had to travel back in time to find your post :GASP:

people drive stoned now. intoxicated driving is illegal, and that applies (or should) equally to pot as to alcohol. i'm sure someone will figure out a breath test for pot should it be legal, or some similar method of detecting the presence of marijuana. there may be one already, i don't know and i don't feel like lookin it up. but i don't see that as a major issue right now, that's something to be determined when and if they pass legislation. if there is demand for it, someone will find a way to do it.

beautiful liar · Post by **beautiful liar** » 3/8/2005, 3:01 am

HI CLAIRE!!!!

beautiful liar · Post by **beautiful liar** » 3/8/2005, 3:05 am

oh. hey!

beautiful liar · Post by **beautiful liar** » 3/8/2005, 3:19 am

are you ignoring me?

beautiful liar · Post by **beautiful liar** » 3/8/2005, 3:19 am

clearly.

beautiful liar · Post by **beautiful liar** » 3/8/2005, 3:20 am

oh. ok.

starseed_10 · Post by **starseed_10** » 3/8/2005, 3:23 am

you shouldn't take that kind of attitude.

beautiful liar · Post by **beautiful liar** » 3/8/2005, 3:26 am

you're right! hey, claire! you're a BITCH!

beautiful liar · Post by **beautiful liar** » 3/8/2005, 3:26 am

FUCK YOU!

beautiful liar · Post by **beautiful liar** » 3/8/2005, 3:26 am

OH YEAH?

beautiful liar · Post by **beautiful liar** » 3/8/2005, 3:27 am

YEAH ASSHOLE!