ClumsyMonkey.net

Too tired now. Remind me to read later.

okay

i cant believe this thread is 200 pages long
like. 5 people post here.

at one point we were presumptuous enough to believe that we would surpass TTYNKAM(TYPDCAA) IV or whatever the initials are.

but we got exponentially slower for a while. and now we've leveled off at a fairly steady drip of not-too-many posts.

AHHHH! why aren't i asleep yet????

ok...rusty...don't forget to check: http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/15807682/

my weed rant

i wouldve added quite a few posts im sure if the net worked lastnight

hotness! all the zeros! *stares*

beautiful liar wrote:ok...rusty...don't forget to check: http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/15807682/

my weed rant

*stretches* Alright now I'm awake and can actually read something and understand time to read.

Since I don't have an account to post a comment there I shall post it here. Simple as pie....wow I could go for pie right about now.... *ahem* anyway here we go:

"I might not agree with what you smoke, but I believe in your right to take a toke."

I like that line. Very nice way to end it. You make a very strong arguement for the legalization of it. I agree with the legalization it would benefit the economy, and cut the "drug wars" down a lot. People would be sure of what they were getting so it would be safer and provided it was sold under controlled circumstances like alchohol is in special stores it would work very well. The only problem with the legalization of it is, what about someone driving under the influence of pot? It's easy to take a quick breathalizer(sp) (forgive my horrid spelling/most likely improper word). Now of course it's easy to smell pot on someone. But that isn't a scientific way of proving they are stoned. Laws demand police to have a scientific check. The only way known to scientifically check for drug use now is a blood test. The police cannot take a blood test because it infringes on our rights. So how do you propose that, the obstacle of drivining under the influence of marijuana be tackled?

beautiful liar wrote:AHHHH! why aren't i asleep yet????

Good grief why weren't you?

beautiful liar wrote::lol: at one point we were presumptuous enough to believe that we would surpass TTYNKAM(TYPDCAA) IV or whatever the initials are.

but we got exponentially slower for a while. and now we've leveled off at a fairly steady drip of not-too-many posts.

I know. We had a good start. I'm so proud we made it this far. *sheds single manly tear* This even must be celebrated.

:nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana::nana:

two hundred nanners! long live the thread!

Dammit Jen look what you did to the page. Is that really 200 dancing banana's?

oh.

my.

god.

*explodes*

two hundred indeed. and this is my 700th :O

yummy zeros.

*explodes again*