Page 20 of 29
Posted: 10/4/2004, 4:19 pm
by Joe Cooler
Sine wrote:Joe Cool wrote:Your backing me up in the sense that whenever religion is brought into this topic its shot down as I said it would be. I'm not saying your ignorant, i'm saying its just a fact of life that religous arguements arent accepted in a non religous forum.
I wouldnt call this forum "Non-Religious" Because from what I've seen, there are alot of religious people in it. I happen to be a catholic. I have been my entire life. I believe in god and go to church and all that jazz. I also happen to be absolutely 100% for gay marriage. i think that if it makes a person happy, they should fly to it. I dont let my restrictive religion dictate my life for me.
Your not a catholic Sine, we've had this discussion.

Posted: 10/4/2004, 7:15 pm
by closeyoureyes
Tayyylorr Did you read *when* I posted that? What i meant anyways was I was brought up in a household where it was unacceptable. Anyways didnt I say later on that I wasnt catholic in this exact thread?

Silly Boy

Posted: 10/4/2004, 7:42 pm
by Joe Cooler

yes.
Posted: 12/9/2004, 10:11 am
by nelison
Posted: 12/9/2004, 10:55 am
by happening fish
Yay Canadia!

Posted: 12/9/2004, 5:07 pm
by closeyoureyes
Posted: 12/9/2004, 6:17 pm
by Dr. Hobo
congrats to the supreme court
Posted: 12/9/2004, 6:19 pm
by reza
i am so proud, they finally did the right thing. we just have to wait for stupid parliament
Posted: 12/9/2004, 6:21 pm
by closeyoureyes
Alberta is already running like hell away from this.

Posted: 12/9/2004, 6:28 pm
by reza
it'll probably pass through parliament. the lib's and NDPs are voting for it for sure. and some of the left leaning conservatives won't have a problem with it...
Posted: 12/9/2004, 6:31 pm
by Dr. Hobo
as is the bloq
Posted: 12/9/2004, 6:32 pm
by Dr. Hobo
the liberals are not voting as a block however and have a free vote
as do the conservatives party
so it'll pass regardless
Posted: 12/9/2004, 6:32 pm
by Random Name
^5
Posted: 12/10/2004, 1:20 am
by I AM ME
Not to mention what his name the gay conservitive will be voting in favor i assume
Posted: 12/10/2004, 3:45 pm
by clumsychild_
Ahh. I was quite happy to hear this.

Posted: 12/10/2004, 4:39 pm
by reza
I AM ME wrote:Not to mention what his name the gay conservitive will be voting in favor i assume
who?
Posted: 12/10/2004, 4:39 pm
by happening fish
What's His Name
Posted: 12/10/2004, 4:41 pm
by Dr. Hobo
im fairly sure thats what hes asking

Posted: 12/10/2004, 4:42 pm
by happening fish
Who's on first?
Posted: 12/10/2004, 4:42 pm
by Dr. Hobo
what