J-Neli wrote:Sorry Rusty, your post was just the one I quoted because it summed up everyone else's posts. A lot of the stuff that's been said has been anti-American, and that was the reason for my comment.
Kermit, Why is freedom of experession and religion in a classroom more important than a child's ability to comfortably learn? You may have been able to alter your position to see the board, but you have had to comprimize your focus in the classroom to some degree. You may have become used to it, but why should anyone have to adjust themselves to accomodate another individual? You are paying for the same service, and therefore should be entitled to the same deal as everyone else.
Furthermore, let's say I joined a religion where it was common to wear a top hat or sombrero as a religious decoration. Should these be allowed? According to your previous post, you would simply have to adjust your self and cope with the situation out of respect for religion. Someone can have their beliefs, that's fine with me, but once those beliefs infringe on my right (in this case my right to learn in comfort) I think we need to draw a line.
And before you say "oh it's not hard to simply shift in your chair," my point is that you shouldn't have to. Each child should have the same advantages as the next and in my opinion your situation discribed above is a disadvantage.
EDIT: outposted (yes i know it was by 10 mins lol)
Are you being serious? If it isn't making it impossible to see the blackboard then why go ahead and take away from someones personal identity.
It isn't fair to both the children who have to wear the turban, and the children who sit behind them.
There isn't anything wrong with secularism (I for one am all for it, in moderation), but it is also important to preserve ones heritage, identity and religion.
You might as well say that kids can't have afro's because it will make it difficult for children behind hte kid to see the board.
Chirac has forced these girls and boys to choose between a future and their god, that's what's wrong with what he's doing.
I think that you're just arguing now, for the sake of arguing.