ClumsyMonkey.net

"OMG youre flag has a leaf u terrerists!!"

i really dont see anybody stepping up against the states.

J-Neli wrote:

Lando wrote:

J-Neli wrote:cue beginning of world war 3.

Who's gonna fight for us? England helped the US with Iraq... I guess we could look to Greenland, they're fairly close...

So maybe I was wrong about the One Month Later, with their help we could last at least 31-32 days. AT LEAST!!!

If the USA attacked Canada I think just about every country would side with us. Canada is by no means Iraq.

Every country would still lose to the USA... Well that's not completely true. Under Clinton's Reign, yes, under Bush's... I doubt it, because only half the country would want to go to war for him.

You couldn't see every country in the world going up against the states? The US doesn't have the man power to fight that, and by no means are they going to nuke every country in the world, if that was going to be anyone's response.

Most countries don't even have good armies. Hell, some countries who are enemies with each other would end up fighting each other when trying to be allies to fight the US. Which would only make them both aid the USA because they're killing each other and saving the States, some work.

I can't imagine too many US troops being behind the idea of fighting Canadians. Course, I don't understand the mindset of soldiers wanting to go kill any people at all, so I guess I can't really talk.

I'm gonna put my money on the allies over the US anyday. 180 countries sending whatever they can to fight is a pretty tough thing to beat. Especially when the US army is currently stretched out in Iraq.

I'm just saying that if the US ever decided to attack Canada I think we'd have a lot of allies, and the US would be in trouble.

Ohhh Yeah.

Of course, but I'm talking theoretically, that's why I mentioned the difference in power of the USA under different Reigns.

Even if there are 180 countries of people fighting with sticks, because they have no major military. They'll have to take slow sail boats or wooden rafts and throw spears. Under Bush's leadership, the US wouldn't stand a chance, because hardly anyone backs him or his motives after the war in Iraq, including those who re-elected him. They won't support another war or his decisions.

ihatethunderbay wrote:my brother (goes to u of o), one of his poli sci profs and a bunch of his friends were getting together to make protests signs

your brother sounds exactly like my brother

what year is he?

3rd year i believe

he wants to be a professor and skate to work in the winter or the rideau canal

This is a crazy conversation.

I think most countries would be scared shitless to make any kind of move.

Bush isn't smart enough to be scared shitless. He probably walks around with shit in his pants and doesn't even realize it.

I don't think she was talking about him... in fact I think she was talking about everyone BUT him.

Can you imagine Americans finding out that their president got arrested by Canada? I'm not sure if they'd burst out laughing or grab for the semi-automatic

...probably the laughing

those with values however would get their guns.

I know I'd laugh! Then I'd cheer on Canada.

mmm Canada

mmm cheese.