ClumsyMonkey.net

Personally I don't care what you do to yourself. I have friends who drink, and smoke, and I enjoy myself greatly while they're drinking, it's a lot of fun to talk to them and what not, and really I could care less whether I was intoxicated or not.

By no means is it morally wrong in my opinion. I'm against drinking under age though. As for smoking a joint I think it should be legal only because it is no different than alcohol in my opinion and should be allowed in private. If it became legal and an age of 18 or 19 was put in as a minimum I would be against anyone who was under age and smoking.

Doing anything to alter your state of mind is morally wrong to me.

I'm also in the no-drinking-or-smoking-or-what-have-you category. the main reason that began was because of my religion (Islam, not LDS like cass), but now if i had the option i wouldn't do any of those things anyway. you wanna get stupid and kill your brain slowly, hit yourself with a frying pan in the head a couple times instead.

Jesus wouldn't be allowed in this thread!!

:OOOOooooo...




But yeah, I'm not much of a drinker. meh. Its just not my thing.

Cass wrote:Doing anything to alter your state of mind is morally wrong to me.

i agree with that for the most part, but i guess it depends on the extent.
I don't see casual drinking as that bad unless it get's overboard.

Random Name wrote:Jesus wouldn't be allowed in this thread!!

saman wrote:hit yourself with a frying pan in the head a couple times instead.

But that's not nearly as much fun!

Oh Jesus would be allowed in this thread. Come on.

He sounds like a pretty chill dude.

its getting less and less shocking now though... people 12/13 years old in high school and even elementary school are drinking/smoking shit... uhh not fun.

Anything that alters state of mind??

What about anti-depressants and schizophrenic drugs.........they alter state of mind.

Cass wrote:Doing anything to alter your state of mind is morally wrong to me.

what about how Church alters your state of mind?

sorry to start a shit fight but it's true

think about it.
EVERYTHING alters your mind if you're gonna take that argument.
you know what she meant.

^:nod:

The chruch supports anti-depressents. Those are disorders. Sure, the church alters your state of mind, but you don't have to take a drug to do it. There is no artifical stimulus. Well hey, maybe that bread and water is going straight to my head.

Actually, I really think that altering your state of mind is something of interest. Anti-depressants can cause all sorts of behavioural and physical problems....probably a lot worse than marijuana. I take anti-depressants, but sometimes wonder if they are doing me more harm than good....

I smoke up every now and then. If I use a vapourizer I can cut out a lot of the pollutants that come with marijuana, or even a bong purifies it. The actual drug really isn't bad for you in moderation.

I wonder how how our more religious CM'ers view this.....

I condemn you all!!

I have very close family members who take anti-depressants. They are needed. The church only supports it as a last option. Yes, they may lead to other problems, but that's not really the point of the this thread, is it? I would be against anti-depressants if people took them to get high.

Drugs fuck up your mind...and just by looking at the people that do drugs at my school alone it's good enough to prove that,

I smoke up maybe 2-3 times a year and drink semi-regularly and I wouldn't say that my mind is "fucked up" thank you

Well that's debatable.














J/K Alex, I love you.