Radiohead's new cd

General Music area.
Did punk rock get it right?
Solidarity 9-6347
Posts: 1960
Joined: 3/13/2002, 6:14 pm
Location: Ann Barbor, MI
Contact:

Post by Solidarity 9-6347 »

im not trying to say that everything complex is genius. in fact a lot of it isnt. i know that ill offend some people here but for example, the new IME album seems to me at least to use the abstract for the sake of being abstract without any real warrant or any meaning behind it.

i just get frustrated when people dismiss a song altogether because they don't understand it. one would think that the reverse would happen and it would only serve to spark one's interest.

as a matter of personal preference, i have more respect for a song that doesnt show all of its assets at once, like a slut :lol:
<3 Mademoiselle Pamplemousse

~The world would be a better place if only more things were made out of statue~
cor3y
Posts: 670
Joined: 10/19/2002, 3:58 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Contact:

Post by cor3y »

Point taken. I think we're just reading each other wrong, and opinions are opinions. Enjoy your CD :P
Solidarity 9-6347
Posts: 1960
Joined: 3/13/2002, 6:14 pm
Location: Ann Barbor, MI
Contact:

Post by Solidarity 9-6347 »

*kicks you*

truce?
<3 Mademoiselle Pamplemousse

~The world would be a better place if only more things were made out of statue~
cor3y
Posts: 670
Joined: 10/19/2002, 3:58 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Contact:

Post by cor3y »

Yes, now I can go to sleep not mad tonight :)
User avatar
Bananababy
Posts: 1601
Joined: 3/17/2002, 8:37 am
Location: Detroit, MI

Post by Bananababy »

SellYourSoul wrote:I've got every Radiohead cd and the last 3 which were hailed as masterpieces are horrible for me to listen to. OK Computer and The Bends were genius. Kid A, Amnesiac, and the new one sound like they have no ideas so they just bullshitted their way through the process by making them weird.

Kid A and Amnesiac were albums with deeper meanings.. you just have to search for them. No, if you simply listen to them, they don't strike you as being genius.
We Suck Young Blood, for example.. I loved that song in the first place, and then I found out that it was about Hollywood, and now I can appreciate it even more.
No, Radiohead isn't a band that comes up with instant hits.. people don't just listen to a song once and go, "AMAZING." A person has to be willing to dig deep and search for the meaning in each song for themselves.
Sorry if I'm not getting my point across clearly.. I'm tired.
boo.
User avatar
Bananababy
Posts: 1601
Joined: 3/17/2002, 8:37 am
Location: Detroit, MI

Post by Bananababy »

Idealist wrote:im sorry but i think needing time to sink your teeth into an album is a good thing. usually if i hear a song and instantly think that its the greatest song i've ever heard it gets increasingly boring in subsequent listens. every time i hear a radiohead song, i hear something different or it strikes me in a differnt way. that, my friends, is mature, developed music. how interesting would you be if you recieved a kindergarten education and never learned anything after that or just simply stayed the same until the day you died? just the simple fact that all of the albums are incredibly different signifies that the band has grown and evolved. nothing genius stays the same. i really seriously cannnot pick a favorite album because they all mean something different to me. kid a and amnesiac may be extremely abstract but that only lends to their dynamic abilities. i personally love how the new album is more beat driven because it really gives phil a chance to shine. i really can't put into words why i love the band because my explanation would fall far short of the truth. it just makes me sad to see the ignorance of people who dismiss something that doesnt incorporate as many hooks into a song as possible to make it catchy and "radio friendly".

steph's my hero :nod:
boo.
User avatar
Bananababy
Posts: 1601
Joined: 3/17/2002, 8:37 am
Location: Detroit, MI

Post by Bananababy »

cor3y wrote:It has nothing to do with being catchy. You're completely misinterpretting what I'm saying. I simply think if a song is truly good, its good the first time you hear it and continues to be good every time you hear it. And I'm not missing out on anything. I like plenty of songs and albums that I don't like the first time around and they grow on me, I just dont think of that music as being anything revolutionary and worthy of being called genius. My problem is when people claim that to be a sure sign of music Godship, when an artist's music is too complex to grasp the first time around. It makes the musician a master of complexity, but not neccessarily music. I guess I'm just not as much of a music elitist as you are. I'll go back to my 'Nsync album now.

I don't believe whether you like a song the first time you hear it or not determines whether the song is "good" or not. Yes, there are songs that grow on you, yes there are songs that grasp you the first time you hear it, they could be both pure genius. I don't think they have to just be one or the other.
and this is my 3rd post.. :freak: sorry guys
boo.
Post Reply