Page 2 of 2
Posted: 6/28/2002, 9:04 am
by stlloki
CitrickAzid wrote:O_L_P JUNKY wrote:if you were blind, sex would not be nearly as fun
dude, your hands would have to be your eyes, that sounds like more fun 
Very true
blindfolded gives the same experiance...with the...hmmm better stop, keep forgetting about the youngins in here
Posted: 6/28/2002, 9:17 am
by barefeet
Axtech wrote:CitrickAzid wrote:O_L_P JUNKY wrote:if you were blind, sex would not be nearly as fun
dude, your hands would have to be your eyes, that sounds like more fun
Yeah, but you wouldn't know who (or what) you were getting in bed with. And you wouldn't know what sex they were... until it would be too late!
oh, you can tell. come on now, if you kissed a boy and then you kissed a girl you'd be able to tell who was who. and not only that but their body types are pretty different, even if you're not just going on their "spot." and then there's voices that you could go by...
Posted: 6/28/2002, 2:10 pm
by call me andrew
i dont think so. i'd much rather be able to see her face(and other stuff...) i'd just die...
Posted: 7/6/2002, 4:10 am
by Lando
Where's the naked option?
Posted: 7/6/2002, 9:25 pm
by Bananababy
This is a very tough decision, but I really have to go with blind... I couldn't live without music and hearing things... it would just be too weird..
Posted: 7/6/2002, 9:32 pm
by christa lynn
I would rather be blind, ahnds down . . . . . except then I would have a really hard time writing my poetry. Well, *insert name-of-really-famous-blind-poet-that-I-can't-romember-the-name-of here* did it and did, so I could too.