ClumsyMonkey.net

depends on the camera, though.

some (like mine) come out very blurry without flash (flash on results in an automatically reduced "shutter speed"). I can't adjust the shutter speed on mine manually, so without flash it's much too slow and results in blurry pictures every time.

Would all like me to post some mroe photos? They arent as good as the ones posted above.

Axtech wrote:depends on the camera, though.

some (like mine) come out very blurry without flash (flash on results in an automatically reduced "shutter speed"). I can't adjust the shutter speed on mine manually, so without flash it's much too slow and results in blurry pictures every time.

this is why i hate my digital camera. because you can't choose your own shutter speed, or f stops. i wish i had me a digital SLR camera

Sometimes it's better with the flash on, sometimes with it off. It depends on the lighting at the exact second you take the picture.

its tricky. Getting a good pic requires good timing on your part, as I found out last tuesday.

To tell you guys the truth, I got the grainy texture in my pictures using the sharpening and brightness/contrast tools from my photoshop program.

I just figured that I need flash for my camera to take clear pictures in motion. Without flash only works well under good lighting when there isn't much movement. My camera flash usually works way better than it did during the OLP concert...I should have recharged my batteries.

Soozy wrote:Sometimes it's better with the flash on, sometimes with it off. It depends on the lighting at the exact second you take the picture.

Actually a lot of it also depends on what is in front of you. If there are heads in your picture between you and the stage, the flash is going to hit those heads and light them up while the stage in the background will then be completely dark in comparison.