ClumsyMonkey.net

oh i know
which is why i said the following to raffia:

sandnippy (5:20:16 PM): why nuke just iran?
sandnippy (5:20:26 PM): theres plenty of other deserving folks!

hmm... according to a blog at what site was it?? ah yes, antiwar.com.

indeed.

meh, it's the internet. It's not necessarily true, but that doesn't mean it's not worth consideration.

fair enough... but let us please be wary

Wary of war and the possibility(Or Threat?) of nuking just everywhere? I agree.

I can't be emotional because I can't be surprised. Well I am a little, I thought they'd go for North Korea.

The US has invasion plans drawn up for every single country on earth. It would be naive to think otherwise. Canada probably does as well. It would also be naive to think that the US wouldn't include their nuclear weapons in such plans.

Canada can't invade anybody. It doesn't even have an army...well not one worth mentioning.

We have like two helicopters that are falling apart. And those Submarines that occaisonally catch fire.

For no apparent reason even

Not only is it from a blog but I'll wager the US has nuclear options for every country. Don't be surprised. They do canvass all options. Whether or not they take them is another matter. If an Australian flew into Capitol Hill ala Debt of Honor then the US would probably have an action plan that included a nuclear strike against Australia. Do I care? Not really. Why? Because the likelihood of it happening is worse than me winning lotto for the next 10 yrs running.

and this is one more step towards world peace.

This has nothing to do with world peace. If the Iranians bomb the living crap out of the US its not the US that broke the peace. Human nature is such that there will NEVER be world peace. Its a nice ideal but its never going to happen.

The point of the article isn't that they have a retaliatory invasion plan, but that their plan doesn't involve Iran being invovled in the initial attack on the US.