The CM Directory (Planning Stage)

Lando · Post by **Lando** » 12/2/2004, 7:27 pm

but most of my posts are SPAM that wont work

Joe Cooler · Post by **Joe Cooler** » 12/2/2004, 7:28 pm

Yeah I was kidding. 100 or so would be decent. Or at least posts from different forums. If someone were to read only posts of mine from the political forum, it would probably read something like this.

Joe Cool: A neo-conservatist anti abortionist who agrees with no one... and thinks he's cool.

Clearly thats not me at all.
At least I hope not.

Dr. Hobo · Post by **Dr. Hobo** » 12/2/2004, 7:32 pm

J-Neli wrote:well they just have to do research then. That's why the search function is there! It has to be used eventually.

the search function sucks

Lando · Post by **Lando** » 12/2/2004, 7:36 pm

you know something! You... er uh so does a vacuum!

closeyoureyes · Post by **closeyoureyes** » 12/2/2004, 7:43 pm

Everyone? All? Unison?

closeyoureyes · Post by **closeyoureyes** » 12/2/2004, 7:45 pm

Joe Cool wrote:Yeah I was kidding. 100 or so would be decent. Or at least posts from different forums. If someone were to read only posts of mine from the political forum, it would probably read something like this.

Joe Cool: A neo-conservatist anti abortionist who agrees with no one... and thinks he's cool.

Clearly thats not me at all.
At least I hope not.

I want to do Taylor!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 :nod:

Lando · Post by **Lando** » 12/2/2004, 7:50 pm

she means sex

dream in japanese · Post by **dream in japanese** » 12/2/2004, 7:52 pm

i call dibs on writing the one for GOD

Joe Cooler · Post by **Joe Cooler** » 12/2/2004, 7:54 pm

God isnt in the top 50. You think he could do better than that.

closeyoureyes · Post by **closeyoureyes** » 12/2/2004, 7:56 pm

I dont mean sex :cuss:

I mean doing Taylor. For the CM Dictionary. Get your minds out of the gutter!

Henrietta · Post by **Henrietta** » 12/2/2004, 8:10 pm

We should just have a list of people and then everyone can volunteer to write for someone else, or you know, a couple if they want. Then if there are some people that no one has taken then we can just all pick up someone else. That way we don't have to do a ton of research. It would be alot easier to write up someone who you know.

Of course, it could end up like in gym class when I always got picked last. Only because I kicked the guys' asses. Foos.

Lando · Post by **Lando** » 12/2/2004, 8:12 pm

I think it would be cool to see multiple snipets of one person, like what a few different people would write about someone. Instead of only one person writing something about another member.

Joe Cooler · Post by **Joe Cooler** » 12/2/2004, 8:12 pm

That could work.

Henrietta · Post by **Henrietta** » 12/2/2004, 8:14 pm

This is too complicated.

Just tell me what to do when a conclusion has been reached.

megxyz128 · Post by **megxyz128** » 12/2/2004, 8:41 pm

yeah but if i don't get picked i'll feel like that kid who gets picked last in gym class.

i agree that it should be random, like someone gets PM'ed a person. oh and i totally want in on this.

closeyoureyes · Post by **closeyoureyes** » 12/2/2004, 8:48 pm

Lando · Post by **Lando** » 12/2/2004, 8:59 pm

Random works, I'm just saying getting like 3 people to write something about instead of only having one thing written by only one other person, so there are different perspectives.

happening fish · Post by **happening fish** » 12/2/2004, 9:02 pm

Damn, the thread's been hijacked! :lol:

closeyoureyes · Post by **closeyoureyes** » 12/2/2004, 9:04 pm

Rusty · Post by **Rusty** » 12/2/2004, 9:07 pm

So much for the dictionary.