Joe Cool's Art Gallery

Joe Cooler · Post by **Joe Cooler** » 9/19/2004, 4:27 pm

Quick preview of how its comming along so far. Very little of it is actually complete except the lights on the front. As you can see vital parts such as the side windows, wheels and grill are missing plus every other part besides the lights need significant detail added to it. Its large.. so I apoligize in advance.

[img]<img%20src="http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2003-12/548620/Bentelyvector.jpg"%20width=800%20height=600>[/img]

starseed_10 · Post by **starseed_10** » 9/19/2004, 5:29 pm

nice.

definitely better than the red one too :thumbs:

starseed_10 · Post by **starseed_10** » 9/19/2004, 5:29 pm

well.... so far

nikki4982 · Post by **nikki4982** » 9/19/2004, 10:41 pm

Wow.

Joe Cooler · Post by **Joe Cooler** » 9/22/2004, 8:41 pm

Here is the final product. This is my third vector and i've definetely come along way since my first but i'm still not where I want to be. My goal is to get good enough that people will mistake my vector for the real thing untill they look a little closer. I dont think i'm there yet but i'm close....

<img src="http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2003-12/548620/BentelyFinished.jpg" width=800 height=600>

beautiful liar · Post by **beautiful liar** » 9/22/2004, 9:08 pm

very close! kudos man, that's awesome!

Johnny · Post by **Johnny** » 9/22/2004, 10:40 pm

Dr. Hobo · Post by **Dr. Hobo** » 9/22/2004, 10:43 pm

i think that could look fine on the right background
i mean on a white background the shadows and what not are more noticeable but if you were to put that on an actual road or something it could work IMO

Joe Cooler · Post by **Joe Cooler** » 9/22/2004, 11:30 pm

True enough. If I made the vehicle smaller it also could work, but i'm not about to do that quite yet. It all comes down to getting a better handle on how to shade the vehicle which in the end requires much more time spent on it. For those who know photoshop, the Bentley above took roughly 250 layers (give or take) and i'm guessing it would take another 50 to get it near photorealistic.

half jill · Post by **half jill** » 9/22/2004, 11:33 pm

tis awesome, yammy.

Joe Cooler · Post by **Joe Cooler** » 9/22/2004, 11:35 pm

Thankee.

Dr. Hobo · Post by **Dr. Hobo** » 9/23/2004, 1:43 pm

oh btw... im fairly sure i wrote that after i took my shot of nyquil last night so i'll say it now.. but that doest look awesome as it is.. i didnt mean the opposite but yeah i do understand what yer saying though

Long Jonny · Post by **Long Jonny** » 9/23/2004, 1:48 pm

great job taylor... looks outstanding!

Axtech · Post by **Axtech** » 9/23/2004, 1:50 pm

Man, that's amazing. A couple of things to improve the realism: make the wheels black, and (if it's put on a background), add reflections of the surroundings on the whole car - body, windows, and all.

But man, that is absolutely outstanding.

nikki4982 · Post by **nikki4982** » 9/23/2004, 11:03 pm

Nice job!

Joe Cool wrote:For those who know photoshop, the Bentley above took roughly 250 layers (give or take) and i'm guessing it would take another 50 to get it near photorealistic.

Eesh.

I hate working on graphics with like... 5 layers. :lol:

I'd go into spasms trying to work on one with 250.

closeyoureyes · Post by **closeyoureyes** » 12/18/2004, 2:31 am

Taylor was the twin who got the artistic talent :nod:

nikki4982 · Post by **nikki4982** » 12/18/2004, 4:00 pm

And there you go bringing back dead threads again.

Joe Cooler · Post by **Joe Cooler** » 12/19/2004, 12:35 am

nikki4982 wrote:And there you go bringing back dead threads again.

Dead!? Art never dies!

nikki4982 · Post by **nikki4982** » 12/19/2004, 1:40 am

Oh it's dead. It's dead and you'll like it!!!

... yeah, I realize that made no sense. And I don't care, so

.

Rusty · Post by **Rusty** » 12/19/2004, 2:04 pm

This is like a Frankenstein thread. It was dead but now it's alive.

Hey it makes just as much sense as nikki's post.