faninor wrote:I can't think of one single band that could pump out a quality album year after year so I don't mind a slower pace. Sure, sometimes it happens (Happiness/SM, Kid A/Amnesiac), but almost all 70's bands I've listened to had a few good albums followed by a lot of mediocre ones.
Joe Cooler wrote:faninor wrote:I can't think of one single band that could pump out a quality album year after year so I don't mind a slower pace. Sure, sometimes it happens (Happiness/SM, Kid A/Amnesiac), but almost all 70's bands I've listened to had a few good albums followed by a lot of mediocre ones.
The Beatles? They wrote and recorded all 13 albums of their albums in six years. Arguably only "Yellow Submarine" sucked. Not bad.
faninor wrote:Joe Cooler wrote:faninor wrote:I can't think of one single band that could pump out a quality album year after year so I don't mind a slower pace. Sure, sometimes it happens (Happiness/SM, Kid A/Amnesiac), but almost all 70's bands I've listened to had a few good albums followed by a lot of mediocre ones.
The Beatles? They wrote and recorded all 13 albums of their albums in six years. Arguably only "Yellow Submarine" sucked. Not bad.
From what I understand they stopped touring halfway through, got tired of working with each other and went their separate ways. I would not want my favorite bands to do that.
Joe Cooler wrote:You could feasibly throw Led Zepplin into your category.
Led Zepplin I, II, III, IV were all recorded and released within three years. "Houses of the Holy" and "Physical Graffiti were released two years apart but are also excellent.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests
Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC - 6 hours • PHPBB Powered
Serving Our Lady Peace fans since 2002. Oskar Twitch thanks you for tasting the monkey brains.