half jill wrote:roll, eh.
ummm yes... thats what i meant to type... you know... cuz one needs to roll joints and all... it uhh... was a pun
Neil wrote:Bandalero wrote:
WHAT!? the crash killed him. And he was driving impaired on both pot and alcohol. to say one killed him and not the other is bogus and you know it.
Driving drunk or high is still an altered state of mind, and both instances are not safe.
You find me statistics showing of vehicular related deaths caused by driving under the influence of marijuana, and not alcohol, and I'll continue this with you. You're whacked. Seriously.
Neil wrote:Bandalero wrote:
WHAT!? the crash killed him. And he was driving impaired on both pot and alcohol. to say one killed him and not the other is bogus and you know it.
Driving drunk or high is still an altered state of mind, and both instances are not safe.
You find me statistics showing of vehicular related deaths caused by driving under the influence of marijuana, and not alcohol, and I'll continue this with you. You're whacked. Seriously.
Neil wrote::lol:
frogger wrote:Can you imagine how wealthy we have made drug lords?
Korzic wrote:Neil wrote::lol:
How are you even trying to argue this?
DUI offences aren't just for alcohol but for most forms of illegal drugs, marijuana included. How you believe it might somehow be ok to drive while in an altered state of pot mind rather than an altered state of alcohol mind is a bit beyond me.
Neil wrote:Korzic wrote:Neil wrote::lol:
How are you even trying to argue this?
DUI offences aren't just for alcohol but for most forms of illegal drugs, marijuana included. How you believe it might somehow be ok to drive while in an altered state of pot mind rather than an altered state of alcohol mind is a bit beyond me.
There is no arguing. Altered state or not.....all you need to do is look at the statistics. As I am typing this message, at least five people have possibly been involved in an automobile accident involving alcohol.
How you can seem to think that driving while high is just as bad as driving drunk; is beyond me.
Neil wrote:There is no arguing. Altered state or not.....all you need to do is look at the statistics. As I am typing this message, at least five people have possibly been involved in an automobile accident involving alcohol.
How you can seem to think that driving while high is just as bad as driving drunk; is beyond me.
Korzic wrote:frogger wrote:Can you imagine how wealthy we have made drug lords?
From pot alone? Not very. Given that your average Joe can grow it in a window sill box and it doesn't require any refinement process. It's cheap, easy to procure, requires almost no processing and a lot of people look on it as legal anyways.
Corey wrote:
Funny, because you're not using statistics at all. There are more people driving on the road drunk than there are high. Therefore, the probability of an accident involving someone drinking is higher. And as Reno suggested, this is probably because alcohol is legal. People go to bars on their way home from work, drive home after parties that have beer, etc, etc. If marijuana was legal, you would have pot bars or whatever and therefore more people on the road that were high. Then you could make a fair comparison as to which substance is more dangerous to drivers.
With your usage of statistics I could make the argument that dogs are better drivers than humans because there are far fewer accidents involving dogs behind the wheel.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests
Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC - 6 hours • PHPBB Powered
Serving Our Lady Peace fans since 2002. Oskar Twitch thanks you for tasting the monkey brains.