by Brooklin Matt » 1/14/2003, 2:50 pm
xchrisx, Narbus has a better sense of logic than you. He continuously is able to dismiss your hazy logic pretty much every time. Sometimes you guys are just talking about two different things and its just a point of view......but I have to agree with Narbus. You just ignore things about humans that you shouldn't. Yes.......Condoms do work.....but yes they DO break, and you can still get diseases with them on......and if you don't care about others, well that's just a shitty attitude to have towards human beings.
Being promiscuous isn't necessairly bad......its just a way of life for some people who are liberal to sexual freedom. But to ignore sexually related problems on a social, physical, and mental scale is pretty ignorant. Obviously people shouldn't be labelled as being promiscuous in public with a big P on their forehead, but if its nothing to be ashamed about, why are you so defensive. STD's are a worry.......and celebrities advertising sex to sell records should be held more accountable (hence criticism)......if everyone acted like people did in "Dirrty" I think we would all be infected with something. I think that being promiscuous accentuates a certain need for females to present themselves as being "sexy" and worrying about superficial qualities when they are not psychologically ready for it. I keep seeing girls that are like 10-12 try and dress "sexy". It makes me think that Christina Aguliera showing her promiscuous side is indeed a corruptive ideal that I think is prevalent in the initial debate we had.