by RileyLewis » 7/3/2014, 9:44 pm
On the one hand, I am sad he is gone, but on the other, he didn't really push the envelope in the last few albums. The first 4 albums (and even a bit on the 5th) he had some really interesting sounds, but on the last few it's been pretty generic.
I also don't like the new direction the band is headed by the sound of the clips. I can't pass judgement until hearing full songs, but it sounds very poppy. Reminds me of World on a String, which was pretty shallow. That's a good way to describe a lot of their recent stuff, unfortunately. Curve was better than Burn Burn, but not as good as the first 4 or 5. It's sad when Gravity can be looked back on as a decent album.
Someone also mentioned that Raine said something about this album was "Naveedesque." All I have to say to that, is that he's said the same thing about every album since Naveed in one way or another. Remember when Burn Burn was going to be a return to Naveed? And it was pretty bland.
I know a lot of you will stay true to the band no matter what, but I think this place (and others like it) are falling victim to "true believer" syndrome. What I mean is, is that anyone who disagrees leaves, and so only the true believers stay. So it looks like most people are excited, but in reality 75% are already gone. Even when Curve came out this place was barely active compared to a long time ago, and that's because people who liked the band's original creativity and drive have grown bored by their plateau and fall into mediocrity. They still put out a good song now and then, but they are nothing compared to some of the older stuff. If every new album has 1 or 2 good songs you can listen to for hours and stay interested, the old ones have 5-10.
I'm sure this post will be mocked in some way or another or I'll be told to stay positive, but that's just another sign of the true believer stuff in action. Over the past 15 years I'm moved away from OLP and toward Matthew Good, and here is the reason: OLP has focused a lot on the image side of things, while Matthew Good has focused on the content. Both bands basically got shook up around 2000, but both were affected differently by it. OLP was pressured into confirming to mainstream rock, and has never recovered as they've basically moved in whatever direction Raine felt (mainstream, then bland stuff, now more poppy/hipster stuff). Matthew Good on the other hand has gone a new, specific direction with each album. One will be full stripped-down rock, the next will be an orchestra-backed experimental album, and the next a throwback to alternative rock of the 80s/90s. Not everyone will like each record since they sound so different, but each is kind of like Spiritual Machines - they have a theme and feel to them that demands respect. How many times has OLP started some PR thing, or contest? Remember the cover contest where they never chose a winner? Or how about the 2 or 3 tour DVDs that were promised but never made? Or the astroturfing done by their PR guy here? Matthew Good on the other hand doesn't really give a shit about most of his fans because that's not why he does it. He'll throw us a bone now and then, but sometimes he's just a dick. And that's okay to me, because he's still creating new and original and edgy music 20 years after he started, something I can't same the say about OLP.
OLP will always hold a place in my heart for their early work, and I will still listen to a few recent songs, but I don't think I'll buy their next CD based on the last 3. It's too bad, but judging by Jeremy's slow devolution over the past 10 years in terms of his creativity on the albums, I think he kind of felt the same away about the direction, or at least the band held him back to be more mundane. They used to be edgy and creative, and now they're ho-hum and Raine-driven.