bovine wrote:Not suicide bombers, no. We usually like to keep our own lives intact when killing civilians whether on purpose or as a tragic accident that always comes with war. Don't take my word for it, check this site out http://www.iraqbodycount.org
Casualty figures are derived from a comprehensive survey of online media reports and eyewitness accounts. Where these sources report differing figures, the range (a minimum and a maximum) are given. All results are independently reviewed and error-checked by at least two members of the Iraq Body Count project team in addition to the original compiler before publication.
For a source to be considered acceptable to this project it must comply with the following standards: (1) site updated at least daily; (2) all stories separately archived on the site, with a unique url (see Note 1 below); (3) source widely cited or referenced by other sources; (4) English Language site; (5) fully public (preferably free) web-access.
Korzic wrote:bovine wrote:Not suicide bombers, no. We usually like to keep our own lives intact when killing civilians whether on purpose or as a tragic accident that always comes with war. Don't take my word for it, check this site out http://www.iraqbodycount.org
You miss my point.
However on that site... while interesting I can see some glaringly big holes in its calculation.
bovine wrote:Korzic wrote:bovine wrote:Not suicide bombers, no. We usually like to keep our own lives intact when killing civilians whether on purpose or as a tragic accident that always comes with war. Don't take my word for it, check this site out http://www.iraqbodycount.org
You miss my point.
However on that site... while interesting I can see some glaringly big holes in its calculation.
They're estimating approx. 30,000 civilians. Let's say that's inflated 1000% (I highly doubt it's that far off). So, 3,000 civilians were killed. That's another 9/11.
Korzic wrote:bovine wrote:Korzic wrote:bovine wrote:Not suicide bombers, no. We usually like to keep our own lives intact when killing civilians whether on purpose or as a tragic accident that always comes with war. Don't take my word for it, check this site out http://www.iraqbodycount.org
You miss my point.
However on that site... while interesting I can see some glaringly big holes in its calculation.
They're estimating approx. 30,000 civilians. Let's say that's inflated 1000% (I highly doubt it's that far off). So, 3,000 civilians were killed. That's another 9/11.
1000% inflation would make it 300
Axtech wrote:Korzic wrote:bovine wrote:Korzic wrote:bovine wrote:Not suicide bombers, no. We usually like to keep our own lives intact when killing civilians whether on purpose or as a tragic accident that always comes with war. Don't take my word for it, check this site out http://www.iraqbodycount.org
You miss my point.
However on that site... while interesting I can see some glaringly big holes in its calculation.
They're estimating approx. 30,000 civilians. Let's say that's inflated 1000% (I highly doubt it's that far off). So, 3,000 civilians were killed. That's another 9/11.
1000% inflation would make it 300
Way to focus on a pointless technicality and completely ignore what he said.
Korzic wrote:1000% inflation would make it 300
bovine wrote:
Despite the fact that my math is, within reason, correct, I think Robbo said it best - you took a technicallity and missed the whole point.
:::troy:::
closeyoureyes wrote:Pretty much. BUt there are certainly more democratic countries than others(I don't mean to say the US or Canada is great, they are not.)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests
Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC - 6 hours • PHPBB Powered
Serving Our Lady Peace fans since 2002. Oskar Twitch thanks you for tasting the monkey brains.