Rusty wrote:I don't think the general public should have access to handguns. They have no use whatsoever. Rifles, shotguns, ok. They are used for hunting, it's not my sport but some enjoy it. Handguns however have no purpose for hunting and are thus useless, except for police officers. However, it is their job to enforce the law and it's a dangerous one at that sometimes, so they may need a firearm at times to protect themselves. However, the general population does not need handguns. I've said it before and I'm saying it again now.
magicseamonkey wrote:don't need automatic weapons either...
yet, they're allowed some places.
mosaik wrote:Rusty wrote:I don't think the general public should have access to handguns. They have no use whatsoever. Rifles, shotguns, ok. They are used for hunting, it's not my sport but some enjoy it. Handguns however have no purpose for hunting and are thus useless, except for police officers. However, it is their job to enforce the law and it's a dangerous one at that sometimes, so they may need a firearm at times to protect themselves. However, the general population does not need handguns. I've said it before and I'm saying it again now.
i'll happily debate you on that.
mosaik wrote:Oooookay. Pit_girl1 it appears that in your opinion a perfect world would be one in which the general populace have no weapons and the government has them all. is that in fact your position?
Rusty wrote:Handguns however have no purpose for hunting and are thus useless, except for police officers.
thirdhour wrote:I don't think automatic weapons should exsist at all, but hey, little late for that one.
pit_girl1 wrote:dream in japanese wrote:harper wants to get rid of gun registry laws in canada
How the hell is he defending that one? Jeez...does he want to turn Canada into the US?
harper's platform wrote:Ending the wasteful long-gun registry and using the savings to hire more front-line police officers.
xjsb125 wrote:Rusty wrote:Handguns however have no purpose for hunting and are thus useless, except for police officers.
That's false. There are some handguns that are in fact used and designed for hunting. The majority will be manufactured for personal defense and law enforcement, but there are some created for competition, hunting small game, and large game. Most states require the caliber of ammunition to be above .223-.24 caliber, which covers the majority of handguns on the market. There are also handguns that operate that use black powder or pyrodex (these are loaded from the muzzle, or the end of the barrel) that have virtually no self defense purpose and are made strictly for hunting.
Rusty wrote:Why do there need to be handguns for hunting anyway?
Rusty wrote:magicseamonkey wrote:don't need automatic weapons either...
yet, they're allowed some places.
I'm against automatic weapons as well, save them for the military.mosaik wrote:Rusty wrote:I don't think the general public should have access to handguns. They have no use whatsoever. Rifles, shotguns, ok. They are used for hunting, it's not my sport but some enjoy it. Handguns however have no purpose for hunting and are thus useless, except for police officers. However, it is their job to enforce the law and it's a dangerous one at that sometimes, so they may need a firearm at times to protect themselves. However, the general population does not need handguns. I've said it before and I'm saying it again now.
i'll happily debate you on that.
Well I didn't say all that for my health. If I only lived with my opinion the world would be a pretty boring place. As long as we keep the debate civil, by all means please let us debate.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests
Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC - 6 hours • PHPBB Powered
Serving Our Lady Peace fans since 2002. Oskar Twitch thanks you for tasting the monkey brains.