Now it's Syria ...

[Kicker774]

[Corey]

That's not entirely true. They have found some biological agents in Iraq.

[Kicker774]

Really? I've barely herd anything other than the fact they've found piles of gasmasks and that they've broken into palaces and places where it's assumed that chemical weapons are located.

Maybe what I'm trying to say is look at this situation like you were from Switzerland or something. You wouldn't see the barage of media basically saying how stubborn and stupid Saddam is but at the same time calling him a ruthless dictator etc etc.

From a neutral standpoint I would think that yes it's pretty clear saddam did have chemical weapons previously but what if now he has lived up to UN inspections and destroyed them? I mean the UN couldn't find any and nither has the US so far (That I've seen).

And now because the US has made all these damming statements and are so sure Saddam still ahs these they may just be making up excuses to cover. Hence the mention of Syria.

Back to reality I'm not sure at this point wether these weapons still exists.
I wouldn't be surprised if they did and I wouldn't be surprised if their never found.

I dunno just trying to look at this from a neutral standpoint the best I can.

Later,
Brian Wright

[Corey]

http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/04/ ... index.html

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/03/ ... 26179.html

http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/04/ ... index.html

http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/04/ ... index.html

admittedly non-conclusive

[Sufjan Stevens]